Hazard

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
PISKIE said:
<laugh> The ball didn't 'roll out the other side', the ball boy rolled off of it because Hazard gave him a boot.
Click to expand...

the boy rolled to the left (our left), if hazard had kicked the boy the ball would've rolled toward him due to this.
 
Frankly none of you actually know what happened and everyone is drawing conclusions due to their supporting bias. As far as I'm concerned, Hazard was stupid to put himself in a position where it can be interpreted as violent conduct. That's if he didnt kick him in the ribs. If he did purposefully then he deserves what he gets. Doesn't excuse the lacklustre performance either way. <ok>
 
Kicked ball but shin caught him in the ribs.

Ball boy= stupid little git. Hazard = foolish to get involved. Kind of sums it up?
 
Drogs said:
the boy rolled to the left (our left), if hazard had kicked the boy the ball would've rolled toward him due to this.
Click to expand...

<laugh> your physics match your excuses.

The ball came loose because the ball boy rolled off of it.
 
Apparently Aston Villa have just bid ten million for the ball boy, as he can hold on to the ball longer than any of thier players <ok>
 
PISKIE said:
<laugh> your physics match your excuses.

The ball came loose because the ball boy rolled off of it.
Click to expand...

grab a ball and try it, if hazard doesn't kick the ball it's not going to move and will roll in the opposite direction to the lad rolling off it.
 
Drogs said:
grab a ball and try it, if hazard doesn't kick the ball it's not going to move and will roll in the opposite direction to the lad rolling off it.
Click to expand...

I just tried it on my living room floor. I got my missus to kick the ball and she said you're talking ****e <ok>
 
Christ's sake. Hazard was a fool, the ball boy was an idiot. Happy? Nothing more to be said.
 
It didn't help that when I asked her to kick the ball, she kicked me in the balls <whistle>
 
PISKIE said:
I just tried it on my living room floor. I got my missus to kick the ball and she said you're talking ****e <ok>
Click to expand...

Piskie very brave that mate! If I'd asked my missus to kick a ball from underneath me I would have been booted in the ribs for sure <ok> possibly on purpose <laugh>
 
Drogs said:
grab a ball and try it, if hazard doesn't kick the ball it's not going to move and will roll in the opposite direction to the lad rolling off it.
Click to expand...

Drogs , calm down dear , you dont need to defend Chelseas honour.

No one gives a fuck about the twatty ball boy.

The only ones that claim to , are tree hugging , dungaree wearing , save the whale , ban the bomb lesbian socialists.
 
Varier2 said:
Frankly none of you actually know what happened and everyone is drawing conclusions due to their supporting bias.
Click to expand...

Yeah, not like there were TV cameras which showed the whole incident or anything.

Knackeredjack said:
Kicked ball but shin caught him in the ribs.

Ball boy= stupid little git. Hazard = foolish to get involved. Kind of sums it up?
Click to expand...

Yes. Pretty much. The only worry with an incident like this is will we see a rise of these types of incidents in future if Swansea/the ball boy aren't punished appropriately? Surely its not good for people that aren't actually supposed to be involved in the football game getting involved and causing people to get sent off and so on?

Not justifying Hazard's behaviour at all but Swansea should be fined for not being able to control their employees.
 
Lucaaas said:
Yeah, not like there were TV cameras which showed the whole incident or anything.
Click to expand...

Come off it mate. You know full well that from all the camera angles we have you can't see if he kicked the ball boy or the ball. <ok> Not appreciating the sarcasm.
 
Varier2 said:
Frankly none of you actually know what happened and everyone is drawing conclusions due to their supporting bias. As far as I'm concerned, Hazard was stupid to put himself in a position where it can be interpreted as violent conduct. That's if he didnt kick him in the ribs. If he did purposefully then he deserves what he gets. Doesn't excuse the lacklustre performance either way. <ok>
Click to expand...

Good post. That's what I can't stand, that stupid supporting bias. Yes, have a bit of banter and wind up now and again but some morons actually see things differently depending on which Club's shirt the offender is wearing.

Hazard was wrong to do what he did. He should have known better and for his stupidity alone he should get 3 games in the bin.

However, there are mitigating circumstances. The lad was acting the prick and the player's team were running out of time so he naturally wanted to get the ball back asap. His blood might have been up too. Also, I'm not aware of this player having any previous in this regard so that should count for something. If that was Joey Barton that did that for example, I'd have him banned for the season!

Slap on the wrists and a 3 game ban should be the punishment and a ban on the stupid kid for acting the c*nt in the first place.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back