There have been many posts and threads lately regarding Holt, Morison and Jackson but no mention of Kane. Could I just make a couple of observations. Pre-season Spurs rated him so highly that he was considered to be an integral part of their squad even though they knew they were buying Adebeyor. They said that he was not going out on loan again and this only changed at the last minute when they signed Dempsey. As I understand it they would only loan him out to a Premiership club who would guarantee him game time. Obviously he would learn no more warming another Premiership bench than he would on the bench at Spurs. When the top 6 clubs lend out their best youngsters on season long loans - Cleverly to Wigan, Wiltshire to Bolton, Naughton to us etc etc - it is always on the understanding that they will play lots of games. The Club who borrow the player usually have to pay a large loan fee, pay his wages and obviously sort out accomodation etc. The only return on the investment comes if the youngster plays and performs well. As always I could be wrong, and often am, but I really do believe that Kane will be starting the next game either as a lone striker, with Wes just behind him or as part of a 4-4-2 if CH is bold enough to stick with that formation during the run of games coming up. If Kane lives up to his potential he could be what is needed to kick start our season and before anyone considers this to be an anti Holt thread I will say that if we do play 4-4-2 I cannot see why Holt couldn't play alongside Kane. After all Bolton had considerable success playing a big tall lad alongside Davies.
