Hamilton vs Rosberg resumes!
Off the back of the latest win by Lewis Hamilton at the Chinese Grand Prix ahead of his teammate Nico Rosberg - the lid has come off and the true feelings between the drivers has come out ahead of the team lead PR that everything was rosy again after last year.
In the post match press conference Hamilton responded to the accusation that Rosberg had been compromised in order to create a buffer between Lewis and Sebastian and that Lewis had backed him up:
Rosberg responded with the following:
Rosberg has even followed this up with the accusation that Hamilton caused an "unnecessary risk" to the chances of a Mercedes 1-2:
Has Rosberg completely lost the plot here or does he have a point?
Is this another example of Rosberg being unable to budge Hamilton and simply not being able to take it?
Where does the rivalry go from here?
Off the back of the latest win by Lewis Hamilton at the Chinese Grand Prix ahead of his teammate Nico Rosberg - the lid has come off and the true feelings between the drivers has come out ahead of the team lead PR that everything was rosy again after last year.
In the post match press conference Hamilton responded to the accusation that Rosberg had been compromised in order to create a buffer between Lewis and Sebastian and that Lewis had backed him up:
"It is absolutely not the case. I wasn't really looking in my mirrors and I wasn't trying to back Nico up to Sebastian.
If he wanted to get close and overtake he could have done. He was always about four or five seconds behind.
He never got close so I don't know what his problem is. I did what they asked me to do. There shouldn't be too much aggro".
Rosberg responded with the following:
"He (Hamilton) compromised my race massively at the time because the best possible race for Lewis was to back me off into Vettel so that Vettel would try to undercut me with an early pit stop.
Then I would have to cover him and then I would have such a long stint at the end of the race that I would be without a chance.
That was very frustrating that Lewis was taking at easy as that on the tyres at the beginning of the stint. Interestingly, he said he was just thinking about himself and that says it all.
What upsets me is that my race was massively compromised and we went through that scenario before the race".
Rosberg has even followed this up with the accusation that Hamilton caused an "unnecessary risk" to the chances of a Mercedes 1-2:
"It was always very close with Sebastian Vettel coming out of the pits and that was completely unnecessary risk to put me in because we had a pace advantage over him.
But we were taking it so easy in that stage of the race that he (Vettel) was right behind me, putting me under pressure and went to try to get me in the pit stops.
It didn't compromise the team result but put unnecessary risk to the one-two and we went through that scenario before the race, which is frustrating.
We'll have a discussion and see how it goes. I'll let you know."
Has Rosberg completely lost the plot here or does he have a point?
Is this another example of Rosberg being unable to budge Hamilton and simply not being able to take it?
Where does the rivalry go from here?