Half year Finance Results

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Bib Fortuna's Maw

Bib Fortuna's Maw

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2011
11,729
755
113
zippidy bang ba zoopla
I know....<yawn> etc.

But, the half year financial results for Celtic are published - they do not include any revenue from the Juventus games.

Headlines

Half-year profit
£14.94m

Turnover
£50.06m (71% increase but then, we had to cover some **** for other teams last season and had no CL)

Bank debt
Net bank debt is £0.13m


Pretty ****ing rude health <ok>

Not for the first time today, I wish I could rewind time about five years and have a word with those folk who moaned about Lawwell not "spending to bury Rangers" etc.

Prudence 1
Abandon 0
 
If ye were a shareholder ye would be loving that, given that there's more cash to come from Champions League!!!
 
I thought we were fcked !!sevco fans counting our green seats !!!! Are they worth more been left empty than filled by an iron Bru voucher ???
 
Good to hear. And another minimum £5m to come from the two legs of the CL plus Scottish Cup and SPL prize money.

Plus I expect one of our good players to go in the summer for £7m+ so I don't think we're be calling in the administrators any time soon.
 
Talking about administration , how many happy days to valentines day ??? Been looking for gone bust card instead of a romantic card for the wife
 
Who cares Timmy? Club and company are separate - the finances of the holding company are irrelevant and have no bearing on how the club performs on the pitch (and vice versa).

Roon yi. <grr>
 
Pud I am sure all Celtic fans are delighted with these figures and more to come
against Juventus and hopefully another one or two more glamorous European ties.
I can see no reason why non shareholders would not be happy with our
Playing and financial success.
 
the super hooper said:
Pud I am sure all Celtic fans are delighted with these figures and more to come
against Juventus and hopefully another one or two more glamorous European ties.
I can see no reason why non shareholders would not be happy with our
Playing and financial success.
Click to expand...

That is true... good to see a strong team and a strong set of finacial results ...we can support Celtic without fear of administration and with continued success on field.
 
The Master of Glesga said:
If you are not shareholder you are not a real fan super hooper.
Click to expand...

I have not said that I am not a shareholder. I tend to keep private matters about
myself just that.
My point could be better understood by fans, true fans, would be well pleased
With the club's figures whether they profited as shareholders or not.

Master of Glesga, As a true fan ( your definition ) of the dead
Rangers and soon to die Rangers International, I feel sorry for
you losing all your money twice, once careless...............
 
the super hooper said:
I have not said that I am not a shareholder. I tend to keep private matters about
myself just that.
My point could be better understood by fans, true fans, would be well pleased
With the club's figures whether they profited as shareholders or not.

Master of Glesga, As a true fan ( your definition ) of the dead
Rangers and soon to die Rangers International, I feel sorry for
you losing all your money twice, once careless...............
Click to expand...

If I was not a shareholder I would be very angry with the figures. Non shareholding fans do not understand that the books must be balanced, they want big money signings and big wages, but they dont want to use their own money.
 
Did chuckles not claim at one time the showing of accounts would show who was top dog after he said Sevco were debt free .Over to you !!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back