Yeah not sure Hill will survive the window, but either way it is more competition so cant be a bad thing. Maybe Harry will play 3 CB with attacking wing backs? Part of me still thinks Onouha should be playing CB as well...
I don't think now is a good time to change formations especially to try 3-5-2. Onuoha never really got a chance at CB, but we don't see the training sessions so we don't know the full story
Mate if I have to choose between Nelsen and Hill I'd chose Nelsen every time. Clint is great also but Nelsen is in the top 10 CB at the moment
Agreed, but I still think Hill has something to offer. It's not out of the question that we'll play 3-5-2 in certain games...
Yeah thats what I was thinking...Harry may tinker to suit certain other teams and their respective set up... I think Hill has done great to be fair...would be harsh on him to get dropped for an untried and unfit Haim. Surely Haim has to be back up for now?
He (Clint) will probably be mostly on the bench, especially when we get Chris Samba, but SHOULD BE KEPT IN THE 25 because of what he has to offer 24/7.
Torres hates playing against us because we give him a good kicking and he hasnt got the pace or trickery to get away from the CBs. We make a point of having as much physical contact as possible and he spends the rest of the match complaining to the ref.
Keep Nelsen (please let this DC stuff be balls), get another starting CB, Hill third choice, Haim utility back, look at Onuoha as CB, goodbye Anton.
Don't know too much about Haim, but I doubt Harry will disrupt our Hill/Nelsen CB pairing unless he brings in someone better and especially quicker than Hill, Nelsen or Haim. Reckon Haim is here mainly as back up.
