Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Leeds United' started by ellandback, Aug 28, 2016.
All I am saying is there are always two sides to a story!
Did DH steal the money, or was he told to take it?
The Courts will decide!!!
Haigh v O'Rourke
Did Haigh manipulate O'Rourke and take him for a complete ride, or did O'Rourke take the piss by continually drinking, wrecking DH's property that he had stayed in since 2016, and only deliver sub standard work?
Again, its down to interpretation!
So his other supportive posts coincide with living in DHs property,none can be taken too serious then.
Allegedly O'R only turned to GFH once Haigh kicked him out of his property, apparently after one too many chances....
All in it for themselves and all screwing our club it seems to me,hope they all rot in hell .
Yes but what I'm saying is OR was getting paid and accommodation to support Haigh, so not unbiased to start with,and he can only backstab Haigh, if he has evidence to do so.
I'd have more respect for whoever is drip feeding you this to log on and say their side rather than tangle you up in it all.
El I suggest you read O'Rourkes version of events which he posted on twitter in a long stream of posts. He did this way before Haigh started fighting back with this by the way. O'Rourke wanted to get media involved because of events and was sick of covering up for the Haigh charity corruption. You are now seeing Haigh as the innocent and I suggest you read O'Rourke's twitter feed for a detailed story.
My advice is to leave it alone for your own good. Someones at fault for the spat between them but there is legals and laws being broken by at least one of them so leave them to it mate
Haigh is as big a con man as Bates you cannot believe a word either of them says. The whole rotten business with GFH stinks.
Quite agree, but I don't hate Haigh as much as I hate GFH. Not quite up there with Bates, but close enough.