1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Guzan

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by JoelTheTiger, May 21, 2011.

  1. Kempton

    Kempton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    24,472
    Likes Received:
    19,023
    Why did we get rid of Duke ? Now we need two keepers . Duke was a far better keeper than Guzan.
     
    #21
  2. TJ

    TJ Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    To be fair to Duke, if he didn't let 3 goals in against Bristol City then he might have had a chance of a new contract. NP seemed content with letting him go but with some impressive performances when called upon I think there must have been a little bit of doubt in NP's mind. He's not a bad keeper at all, nothing special but he's solid and gets the job done. Good back-up I'd say.
     
    #22
  3. HFFP

    HFFP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,776
    Likes Received:
    1,192
    #23
  4. MattTheTiger

    MattTheTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,660
    Likes Received:
    120
    Duke was awful! Never have I seen a goalkeeper as tall as him get lobbed when he was standing on his line. Hugely dodgy and got beat at his near post way too often. Glad to see the back of him. Guzan I think is in the same mould as myhill. Good shot stopper but doesn't really command his area very well and his decision making at times is questionable to say the least. However he's still young for a keeper and I have no doubt that if he played regular first team football he would improve hugely. If we can get him reasonably cheap then i'd say go for it. I'd obviously rather have mannone but he seems very injury prone. Guzan with eilhoff as a back up would be fine for me.
     
    #24

Share This Page