Guardiola keen on move to London

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
it certainly would be interesting, but don't underestimate the job he did at Barca and Bayern, it's not as easy as you think keeping Champions motivated, as Mourinho is finding out this season :biggrin:

Certainly is easy, when you have to play Getafe, Malaga and Bilbao every week! <ok>
 
FFP has been modified so City can spend far more now hence they bought De Bruyne and Sleepy this summer.

You financial advantage has been eroded by the new TV deal from next season too.

You've had a huge financial advantage for two or three years but you blew it I am afraid. It is less now
How did we blow it? By improving?

Blowing it is selling some of your best players to your rivals, spending a load of money on crap that can't make the first team and languishing just above the relegation zone!
 
Certainly is easy, when you have to play Getafe, Malaga and Bilbao every week! <ok>

Or Real Madrid, Valencia, Atletico Madrid, Seville or Villareal.

And just for the record Getafe, Malaga and Bilbao are no worse than some of the sides Chelsea have lost to this season:biggrin:
 
Or Real Madrid, Valencia, Atletico Madrid, Seville or Villareal.

And just for the record Getafe, Malaga and Bilbao are no worse than some of the sides Chelsea have lost to this season:biggrin:
Thats because Chelsea are playing like utter **** mate.
No real puzzle there.
Real and Barca's ridiculous advantage over the rest of the league in arranging their own TV deals, ensures that La Liga will remain slightly more high profile version of the SPL.
Even Atletico or Valencia popping up once a decade to nick a title can't help it.
 
Thats because Chelsea are playing like utter **** mate.
No real puzzle there.
Real and Barca's ridiculous advantage over the rest of the league in arranging their own TV deals, ensures that La Liga will remain slightly more high profile version of the SPL.
Even Atletico or Valencia popping up once a decade to nick a title can't help it.

I agree the TV situation in Spain needs looking at, however he got the better of Real Madrid more often than not, and they where spending a lot more money than his Barca side was. Even Mourinho struggled to stop Peps Barca, when he was at Real:biggrin:
 
I agree the TV situation in Spain needs looking at, however he got the better of Real Madrid more often than not, and they where spending a lot more money than his Barca side was. Even Mourinho struggled to stop Peps Barca, when he was at Real:biggrin:
Thats because, like SAF in 92, he was lucky enough to have half a dozen awesome players come through the Youth Academy. Thats not to say SAF's successes were solely down to that, he kept United challenging long after most of 92 lads had bailed, on a much cheaper budget than most considering Uniteds spending power.
Guardiola on the other hand, was given a team that pretty much has a 50% chance of winning the league every year anyway, and on top of that, given youth players like Xavi, Iniesta and Messi.
 
Thats because, like SAF in 92, he was lucky enough to have half a dozen awesome players come through the Youth Academy. Thats not to say SAF's successes were solely down to that, he kept United challenging long after most of 92 lads had bailed, on a much cheaper budget than most considering Uniteds spending power.
Guardiola on the other hand, was given a team that pretty much has a 50% chance of winning the league every year anyway, and on top of that, given youth players like Xavi, Iniesta and Messi.

It wasn't down to luck that those players came through our academy, when Fergie took over he hired more scouts and invested more in the youth development system, and it payed off. Had another manager been there those players may have been snapped up by other academy's. Beckham and Giggs certainly would have been anyways. Becks was poached from London, and Fergie himself went round to Giggs's family home to persuade him to join us rather than City.

As far as Guardiola and getting lucky with the youth players that came through, who coached those players in Barcelonas academy before they where promoted to first team action? Guardiola did. That's why the team instantly responded to him when he took over the first team, as the key players already liked and respected him :biggrin:
 
I agree the TV situation in Spain needs looking at, however he got the better of Real Madrid more often than not, and they where spending a lot more money than his Barca side was. Even Mourinho struggled to stop Peps Barca, when he was at Real:biggrin:

It already has been addressed and effects Spanish football from 2016.

Chelsea and Real's Jose finished Pep off in April 2012. Barca had won 15 on the bounce heading for another treble until they met Rambo & co.

They lost to Jose at home in the Camp Nou and were finished off by Chelsea. Season over
 
It wasn't down to luck that those players came through our academy, when Fergie took over he hired more scouts and invested more in the youth development system, and it payed off. Had another manager been there those players may have been snapped up by other academy's. Beckham and Giggs certainly would have been anyways. Becks was poached from London, and Fergie himself went round to Giggs's family home to persuade him to join us rather than City.

As far as Guardiola and getting lucky with the youth players that came through, who coached those players in Barcelonas academy before they where promoted to first team action? Guardiola did. That's why the team instantly responded to him when he took over the first team, as the key players already liked and respected him :biggrin:
Not debating that Pep isn't good at coaching kids.
Its his tactical nous I am questioning.
You could have put Wilson from Castaway in charge of that team and it still would have mopped up most of the trophies on offer, purely because they were a different class.
 
Woah! Woah! Woah!

Steady on, boys! Don't get too carried away, here!

Here's some news in, hot off the press...

Former Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers is being lined up as an interim manager at Chelsea - should they fire under-pressure Jose Mourinho. (Belfast Telegraph)

Alternatively, Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich is preparing to replace manager Mourinho with former Blues boss Andre Villas-Boas. (Metro)

So, which one of these two would you boys like to see take over at Chelsea? True, Rodgers was a clown at 'Pool, but he did manage to get them 6th or 7th spot most years, which is more than Jose is looking capable of, this season. <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Woah! Woah! Woah!

Steady on, boys! Don't get too carried away, here!

Here's some news in, hot off the press...

Former Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers is being lined up as an interim manager at Chelsea - should they fire under-pressure Jose Mourinho. (Belfast Telegraph)

Alternatively, Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich is preparing to replace manager Mourinho with former Blues boss Andre Villas-Boas. (Metro)

So, which one of these two would you boys like to see take over at Chelsea? True, Rodgers was a clown at 'Pool, but he did manage to get them 6th or 7th spot most years, which is more than Jose is looking capable of, this season. <ok>

Anyone looking to replace Jose is a clown. A few bad games does not a season end. Things will turn around and it's a matter of circumstance and a few things happening at once making life difficult for Chelsea. I'd take Jose over anyone everyday. He's been right every time in all of his decisions. I'll let him make a few more thanks.
 
I think the problem with Guardiola going to Chelsea, is that Chelsea have been playing the way they play for so long now, and the squad have been built to play that way, so it would take a massive overhaul for Guardiola to implement his style of play. The flair players that Guardiola likes, the likes of the Mata's and De Bruyne's who are good at keeping the ball have been shown the door, and been replaced by players who are more defensively minded. The defence aswell is built to play the Chelsea way, you really think that a slouch like Ivanovic would play fullback in a Guardiola side? Or Terry would get a game at centre half with the defence pushed up to the half way line? No chance. AVB tried to get Chelsea playing that way, and it backfired spectacularly, so I don't think it would be a good idea for Chelsea to hire that type of coach again. Unless they are prepared to give him lots of time and accept some poor seasons during a long transitional period.

Guardiola I think will leave Bayern soon, I think he just wants a Champions League trophy with them and then he'll be off. And I think it's very likely he'll come to the Premier League, but it will be with either ourselves or Arsenal, all depending on who's got a vacancy at the time. Though I think it's a strong possibility that there's already an agreement for him to take over once LVG leaves next season :biggrin:

If he's not coming to us because of ****e football he's not coming to you either. Don't talk absolute rubbish about how you play amazing modern football. It's ****e, just like ours.
 
Woah! Woah! Woah!

Steady on, boys! Don't get too carried away, here!

Here's some news in, hot off the press...

Former Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers is being lined up as an interim manager at Chelsea - should they fire under-pressure Jose Mourinho. (Belfast Telegraph)

Alternatively, Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich is preparing to replace manager Mourinho with former Blues boss Andre Villas-Boas. (Metro)

So, which one of these two would you boys like to see take over at Chelsea? True, Rodgers was a clown at 'Pool, but he did manage to get them 6th or 7th spot most years, which is more than Jose is looking capable of, this season. <ok>

Rodgers gets some unfair treatment IMO. I mean he should have a league title at least but they were unbelievable to watch. There is nobody even close to playing football as good as that in our league at the moment.
 
If he's not coming to us because of ****e football he's not coming to you either. Don't talk absolute rubbish about how you play amazing modern football. It's ****e, just like ours.

It may be ****e, but it's still a possession based style of play, so it would be far easier for Guardiola to coach us to play his way.

I'm not saying that I enjoy watching the way we play, I prefer Fergies way, but we do keep the ball better than any side in the Premier League. The possession stats don't lie :biggrin:
 
Now, you're being linked with Capello!

You boys must be despairing!
 
No Diego but Chelsea fans have been touting his name for a while as the remedy for all the club's ills.