Greta Thunberg

[DUNCAN DONUTS]

True, we just outsource our child labour to other countries these days.

So we force these brown people to use child labour ?


Not sure if that's correct mate , the slave drivers are surely partly responsible.

And the parents of the exploited children could surely do something.

It's much easier to blame the evil white capitalists though .

 

[DerekTheMole]

Duncan's found an excuse to talk about evil brown people again. Surprised.

 

[Chief]

Everyone calling one another racists now, deffo just politics thread mark 3.

 

[Sucky]

Everyone calling one another racists now, deffo just politics thread mark 3.

 

[Stan]

Duncan's found an excuse to talk about evil brown people again. Surprised.

I knew he wouldn’t last long on his all new politics thread. Just reading Saxton’s spam was never going to satisfy his urge to post about brown people whenever possible.

 

[PINKIE]

So we force these brown people to use child labour ?


Not sure if that's correct mate , the slave drivers are surely partly responsible.

And the parents of the exploited children could surely do something.

It's much easier to blame the evil white capitalists though .

Our demands for cheap clothes, electrical goods, foods etc drives this trade in child labour, and yes the slave drivers are partly responsible too.

Adults failing children, regardless of colour.

 

[DUNCAN DONUTS]

Hiag posted an image of 9 exploited children .
Greta a middle class Western child and 8 brown faced children from countries that don't have the same ideals as Westerners .


It's somehow the West's fault though.


Let's just brand me racist for pointing out the obvious and NEVER EVER blame the actual bastards that exploit the children .

Bizarre

 

[Stan]

Our demands for cheap clothes, electrical goods, foods etc drives this trade in child labour, and yes the slave drivers are partly responsible too.

Adults failing children, regardless of colour.

It’s the browns’ fault. The whites are doing them a favour by funding their child labour. It’s actually a humanitarian act, not an exercise in maximising profit margins.

 

[DUNCAN DONUTS]

Our demands for cheap clothes, electrical goods, foods etc drives this trade in child labour, and yes the slave drivers are partly responsible too.

Adults failing children, regardless of colour.

So the actual slave drivers that exploit these children are partly responsible?

That's big of you to admit that , it's more my fault for buying imported products though ?


You are mental
.

 

[PINKIE]

So the actual slave drivers that exploit these children are partly responsible?

That's big of you to admit that , it's more my fault for buying imported products though ?
.

Of course they are partly responsible.

Consumers have been drip fed a diet of cheap clothes, food, products etc and been told that 'market forces' determine the thrust to drive down prices. The 'cheap' products have hidden costs elsewhere in the production and supply chain though. Much of it child and slave labour and dangerous working conditions.

 

[Big Ern]

So the actual slave drivers that exploit these children are partly responsible?

That's big of you to admit that , it's more my fault for buying imported products though ?


You are mental
.

when develpoing countries stand up to the West they tend get invaded and 'freed'

 

[Hoddle is a god]

True, we just outsource our child labour to other countries these days.

Awkward this, for Duncs.

 

[brb]

Our demands for cheap clothes, electrical goods, foods etc drives this trade in child labour, and yes the slave drivers are partly responsible too.

Adults failing children, regardless of colour.

Haven't read the last few pages, so apologies if I've missed anything but genuine question...

When we import cheap clothes, most retailers regardless of price, from cheap to expensive, will import from the same countries, however, how do we know as consumers what the labour get paid for their product we buy?

By that I mean, just because something is expensive, does not mean that the labour gets paid more, as that would depend on the commercial advertising outgoings and many other equasions of that retailer. I assume.

Second part of the question, is there a list somewhere that consumers can obtain, to evidence what retailers pay the manufacturer and what they in turn pay their workforce?

 

[Stan]

I hope you’re all watching the athletics.

Great 10k just finished, top class long jump competition going on at the minute.

 

[DUNCAN DONUTS]

In the UK we banned child Labour in the 1800s because it's inhumane and cruel .

We treat the actual slave drivers as criminals not the consumer .

We could do the right thing and stop funding these unscrupulous people but cutting the money probably won't benefit the children working to feed themselves.

There are plenty of super rich Indians but they clearly don't give a **** about starving children , partly because they see them as inferior.


Just more hypocrisy from Pixie as he Swans around in his trainers made by Indonesian poor people getting paid a pittance .

You are the evil white capitalist pig that you complain about you daft bastard.

 

[PINKIE]

Haven't read the last few pages, so apologies if I've missed anything but genuine question...

When we import cheap clothes, most retailers regardless of price, from cheap to expensive, will import from the same countries, however, how do we know as consumers what the labour get paid for their product we buy?

By that I mean, just because something is expensive, does not mean that the labour gets paid more, as that would depend on the commercial advertising outgoings and many other equasions of that retailer. I assume.

Second part of the question, is there a list somewhere that consumers can obtain, to evidence what retailers pay the manufacturer and what they in turn pay their workforce?

You're right, just because something is expensive in the UK, it doesn't mean it costs more to manufacture than the cheaper items. Most of that added cost comes down to the way it's marketed, advertised, packaged and sold as a 'premium' product. Loads of stuff is made in the same factories, to the same spec and then simply rebranded when it comes into the European markets. So I would expect that whether it's a Gucci handbag or a bag destined for Primark, the labour costs are probably very similar.

Not sure about a list for consumers, but there's plenty of info on the Western companies that use child/cheap labour out there

https://www.careeraddict.com/10-companies-that-still-use-child-labor

 

[Stan]

In the UK we banned child Labour in the 1800s because it's inhumane and cruel .

We treat the actual slave drivers as criminals not the consumer .

We could do the right thing and stop funding these unscrupulous people but cutting the money probably won't benefit the children working to feed themselves.

There are plenty of super rich Indians but they clearly don't give a **** about starving children , partly because they see them as inferior.


Just more hypocrisy from Pixie as he Swans around in his trainers made by Indonesian poor people getting paid a pittance .

You are the evil white capitalist pig that you complain about you daft bastard.

The U.K. government could increase taxes on the rich companies that exploit child labour and add the extra proceeds to the foreign aid pot.

 

[PINKIE]

In the UK we banned child Labour in the 1800s because it's inhumane and cruel .

We treat the actual slave drivers as criminals not the consumer .

We could do the right thing and stop funding these unscrupulous people but cutting the money probably won't benefit the children working to feed themselves.

There are plenty of super rich Indians but they clearly don't give a **** about starving children , partly because they see them as inferior.


Just more hypocrisy from Pixie as he Swans around in his trainers made by Indonesian poor people getting paid a pittance .

You are the evil white capitalist pig that you complain about you daft bastard.

Like you said, is it the fault of the consumer for buying these products, or the companies the drive this demand for cheap goods in the first place ?

 

[brb]

You're right, just because something is expensive in the UK, it doesn't mean it costs more to manufacture than the cheaper items. Most of that added cost comes down to the way it's marketed, advertised, packaged and sold as a 'premium' product. Loads of stuff is made in the same factories, to the same spec and then simply rebranded when it comes into the European markets. So I would expect that whether it's a Gucci handbag or a bag destined for Primark, the labour costs are probably very similar.

Not sure about a list for consumers, but there's plenty of info on the Western companies that use child/cheap labour out there

https://www.careeraddict.com/10-companies-that-still-use-child-labor

You could probably be reasonably sure that most of us, have purchased something relating to one of those companies listed at some point in time. In fact I'd probably say it's pretty much a certain.

All the public would have to do in the global economy is refuse to buy from those companies, but we all know that will never happen, so really everyone of us exploits children in some way. Yet those companies listed, make the biggest profits in the world. That's your problem with a global market, exploitation.

 

[DUNCAN DONUTS]

Like you said, is it the fault of the consumer for buying these products, or the companies the drive this demand for cheap goods in the first place ?

So it's your fault that some horrible bastard snatched kids off the street forced them to work for pittance because you like wearing your fancy shoes with a logo on the side

We got there in the end .