Because instead of constructive decent discussion, it just melts down into "well your player could flop" "well YOUR player could flop" and so on and so forth. Anyone with an IQ over 10 knows that any player in NUFC or SAFC could flop. Some are perhaps higher risk than others. Just repeating that same thing without any constructive points is just a waste of time. It isn't JUST about scoring goals. Read. A team could score 5 goals a match, but if they concede 6, then they'll be relegated. Controlling the overall game more than the opponent shouldn't be sacrificed to just try and poach goals. It's that sort of control we sacrificed by having Nolan, just so he could do the job which is supposed to be done by some quality strikers.
Because instead of constructive decent discussion, it just melts down into "well your player could flop" "well YOUR player could flop" and so on and so forth. Anyone with an IQ over 10 knows that any player in NUFC or SAFC could flop. Some are perhaps higher risk than others. Just repeating that same thing without any constructive points is just a waste of time. my first post was **** all like that anyway and wasnt even aimed at you but im a mong and have an IQ under 10 huh??? you lad are a cock
Haway Chappaz, you were very vocal in the 'Whickham' is a massive gamble debate. Can't have it both ways mate.
Why is it so hard to comprehend that you can score goals AND avoid conceding them? Are you really 31 years old? Anyway, as for your theory, tell that to Blackpool. He was, but I was just trying to discuss it constructively to people who somehow disputed that he could possibly be a flop and that his fee wasn't excessive for such a gamble. 'Smithy' is just repeating the same line over and over again and not really adding anything to it. No one is disputing that they could be flops, anyone could, but really it's tiresome.
and how am i repeating the same line my chum??? sorry i bow to your football knowledge, but cant you defend and control the match for 89 minutes and conceed a goal in the last minute???? would goals be everything then?? just a thought like.
All we're doing (mags) is explaining why we're optimistic about next season. You asked why, after losing our top scorers, we can think we're in a better position. Some mags have came along and answered your question. However, your response to the answers you were looking for is "well they're unknowns and they might flop". Yeah, we get it, but if that's all you're going to say there was no point in answering your question. I thought you genuinely might be interested in what we're thinking, but your response just made it obvious that it's another NUFC vs SAFC point scoring game.
You are a boring tedious man, but you were successful in dragging the point I was making somewhere else entirely so I guess congrats for now
well that was your answer and that was my answer no need to be a bitch about it is there?? none of the other lads that were over here reacting to post's felt the need to be a prick so why did you??? and for the record this is the first time ive even commented on a newcastle oriented post, so how i can be repeating my self over and over like you put it, i dont know... anyway cant be arsed to sit and argue with you or anybody else for that matter, so if you dont like me or my opinion just keep it to yourself and i will do likewise? deal??
