Hindsight is always 100% correct and has a lot of followers

True dat.
For the record, if we ever want to arm religious fundamentalists who openly want to introduce a Theocracy against an openly atheist system of control, I disagree with foresight.
If we want to send help to a religious group who simply want the right to be recognised as part of a secular or pro-atheist society, then I agree with foresight.
In the modern age, religion shouldn't be the basis for rule but everyone should have the right to worship whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone.
Jeez, the whole forum's awful serious today - I might as well dae some work FFS.
Get it roon ye, taigy bhoy.


Hindsight is always 100% correct and has a lot of followers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17549388
Good to see someone who says it like it is back in the British Parliament.
Let's hope George sticks it to the back slapping parasites from all parties.
As much as I like him sticking it to the huns he is a pandering hypocrite for mass murderers and tyrants
And there is more evidence of him receiving payments for barrels of oil than there is of the coalition going to war over oil
CiaranArdoynian:2550448 said:As much as I like him sticking it to the huns he is a pandering hypocrite for mass murderers and tyrants
And there is more evidence of him receiving payments for barrels of oil than there is of the coalition going to war over oil
Would that be the same 'mass murderers and tyrants' that the West pandered to when it suited them?
CiaranArdoynian:2550474 said:That's why he is a hypocrite
As are they all.
So hun bashing is all he has going for him
Must have something people like
keeps getting the votes
Whatever line of bullshit that'll get him the necessary votes in any given area.
Whatever line of bullshit that'll get him the necessary votes in any given area.