You actually replied to me when I said nothing had changed as it's all speculation, saying "apart from this." So if you didn't mean that his post indicated he may be leaving what did you mean by saying " apart from this"?
Everyone has completely overlooked the most important issue at hand. My son is on holiday in Portugal with his Auntie with a handful of hard earned Euros. He will be taking said hard earned Euros to a shop to buy a Portugal shirt with Fonte 4 on the back. If Jose goes I will be writing to him asking if he would like to Purchase it off me as a memento to give to his son at the age of 15. I expect him to agree to this and I will advise him of that expectation in my letter.
If you can't grasp a basic principal then perhaps this isn't the place for you You seem a bit out of your depth lol. Somebody asked (if you would care to read the whole thread before sticking your oar in) what had changed since a few days and I shared a photo which I and many others elsewhere found strange. What is it you're not getting here? I didn't say it meant he was unequivocally leaving. I answered a question.
Are you serious? Go back and read the thread mate. You were answering my post with the picture! Not the post asking what has changed. It is literally two pages back in this thread. Go and read it hahahaha
Stop throwing around insults haha. It's a football forum and you've been proved wrong. Don't have to say I'm talking out of my arse and that I'm out of my depth. Who is the one throwing a tantrum because they have been called out on saying something a bit stupid?
You're really just not getting this There is a difference between me saying it means he's definitely leaving and me offering an Instagram photo to somebody who asked what had changed in the fast few days to rouse further suspicion he might be away. It could be an indication, yes, and I haven't once denied saying that. Do you have arguments with yourself often lol?
You were replying to me, not somebody else. As ive already said, go back and read the thread. My whole point was that it wasn't an indication at all. Little point in replying to you because I'm not quite sure you are familiar with the concept of logic, as you just seem to get pissed off that somebody isn't agreeing with you rather than discussing it. Perhaps a forum isn't the right place for you. Let's end this here.
A tantrum You've only made yourself look stupid here, you tried to act the forum wise guy with your initial post (which somebody already posted a short while before- read). So I can't throw out insults (if that's how you're taking it) but I have to read your sarcastic replies to me? That makes sense oh lord of not606.
Don't reply then, if you had shown that diligence initially then you wouldn't have ended up looking like the class clown. Bet you're going to reply again too
The conversation as it should have gone. Northern Irish Saint: I can see how you thought that was what I meant, but I never meant it that way. MLsfc: Oh sorry, misunderstood you. Northern Irish Saint: That's ok....easy mistake to make.
Austin played for half a season with Pelle. So if we had 2 strikers and sell 1 we now, by my maths, have 1. Therefore we have not replaced Pelle. Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
No he didn't. He played for about 12 minutes. It was pretty clear at the time he was brought in as Pelle's replacement.
It was said at the time Austin came in as an extra striker and has been confirmed since that Pelle wanted to go in January, which is why Austin was bought in readiness. It was also opportunistic as Ausin was available at a bargain price (he was in fact only the cost of one Charlie Austin) Therefore we have replaced Pelle (just not same type of player).
