$77.99. They don't draw attention to you with a good VPN as no one knows who you are. There aren't an hacking risks as far as I know.
Cheers, I'll get them. I had tried using a remote connection to my PC to watch stuff occasionally but the feed is too slow, like watching old CCTV footage but not quite as bad. I can't find one that has a seamless connection and quality refresh rate without spending mega on it.
I bought a lighting av adapter for my iPhone £40 for the apple one just connects your phone to the tv via hdmi cable
I'm probably being a bit thick here but if the streams are to be shut down at source by ISP's what difference does having an anonymous vpn make?
Has anyone had a warning letter from their ISP about illegal streaming? I read a lot of letters in a new initiative are going out to broadband account holders. Has a private individual (I mean not a pub owner) ever been prosecuted in the UK for watching a movie/football through the net?
There's been quite a few, the pubs are often reported by other local pubs who are paying for Sky subscriptions. The Navigation Inn (which is that ****hole Boro pub, next to the ground, where all the Stone Island lads stand outside), was recently done. They were fined £4,200 for the offences and ordered to pay £3,410 in costs, with an additional £120 charge, all the equipment was seized as well.
I don't know about that one, but the Premier League were the main ones pushing that for copyright infringements as the coverage had their logo flash up. It was seemingly more difficult to get a prosecution if the pub had a legit Sky subscription of some kind, hence it being mainly the back street type boozers tackled, who'd also be less likely to be able to afford to contest it. Domestic streams and Kodi are different.
Do you think ordinary UK householders will ever get prosecuted for watching a film through Kodi or a game on the web?
I don't know. On the one hand, it should be easier to get the information and a few prosecutions would put a dent in the market through fear, but on the other, there do seem to be a fair amount of grey areas with what's allowed. Last I read, they were focusing on the distributors and host sites.
I personally stream because it's easy and I can watch any live sport I want. It's like the music industry. Piracy threatened to kill it but then Spotify and iTurnes came along. People want convenience and streaming is the most convenient way to access content. Until Sky or BT provide a reasonable streaming service and until this pathetic saturday 3:00pm black out stops people will continue to stream. It's utterly ridiculous that an American can stream any Premier League game he/she likes legally yet over here we're charged an absolute fortune on the off chance that your team is picked to be on television.
It's not just about what BT or Sky do is it? The Premier League could sell a package to TV involving all games being shown on TV but they have decided that's not in their interests.
It's highly unlikely, it's far easier for them to go after those who stream, then it is those who just watch.
No not at all, I only mentioned them as they're the two most prominent producers of sports content in the UK. It would be nice of the Premier League to step up to Sky but Sky pay them an absolute fortune to stay onside.
Unlikely. Even less unlikely if you use a VPN. The only time an individual would be in bother is for sharing material via torrents.
