Good old Ken Bates

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Tell them to feck off and go after Bates, FFS you couldn't make this ****e up..:headbang:

Not how it works. Bates was LUFC at the time, he sold responsibility and liability to GFH and they passed 75% of it to Cellino. That's what due diligence finds out, and why he can't moan having done none.
 
Not how it works. Bates was LUFC at the time, he sold responsibility and liability to GFH and they passed 75% of it to Cellino. That's what due diligence finds out, and why he can't moan having done none.

Can't see the skint Arabs paying their 25% of it
 
Not how it works. Bates was LUFC at the time, he sold responsibility and liability to GFH and they passed 75% of it to Cellino. That's what due diligence finds out, and why he can't moan having done none.

I don't care how it works or know how it works, all I'm saying is when is this crap going to stop....<grr>
 
Surely Bates as the owner at the time is resposible he wants the rights to broadcast well he must be forced into paying or withold his rights to broadcast the games fight fire with fire

Bates sold LUFC for a price that included GFH assuming any liabilities the company had at the time ownership changed hands. Gfh could have said no and this would have either increased the sale price or killed the deal.

Gfh did the same for 75% of the company and its liabilities when idiot features took a controlling stake. It was down to gfh and then Cellino to undertake due diligence. It is Ken bates we are talking about after all.

We are where we are and Cellino is running the club like a complete amateur. How much more **** is he going to bring to our door?