God Squad

I remember Kamran did.

Where the **** is Kam anyway?

 

here read this it explains the above comment by you and subsequent ones

http://www.al-islam.org/about/contributions/humanreproduction.html

 

I am not sure, but its certainly not the written word as supplied by some ancient lying bastard who had their own agenda, just look at the recorded press nowadays, all a load of lying contriving bastards, without exception.

 

yeh thats not an answer

it was a mistake, once science proved wrong.

Now we are getting somewhere. BTW, for this to work you have to have an open mind. The quran for this purpose is not fact and not evidence. It was wrong plain and simple.

 

I always discharge first and weve got two boys and two girls and they all look like me.

 

I've just wasted an hour reading through this thread, and I notice thefanwithnoname is no longer making any attempt to hide his refusal to accept basic scientific knowledge. It was also quite laughable to see him quoting those notable, much-lauded scientific journals 'New Scientist' and 'The Times' to attempt to back up his more than spurious claims about (nay, rejection of) the diversification of early apes into those that exist today. Also, he appears to be a member of the "if I add 'FACT' to the end of each sentence then I'm automatically right" gang. Additionally, I find it hard to believe that a man who cannot distinguish between apes and monkeys has anything more than a childlike grasp of Biology. Please at least attempt to look into the science behind modern Evolutionary Theory, perhaps starting with DNA evidence (I feel that 'endogenous retroviruses' will be of particular interest in this case).

Yes, of a fully functioning, modern microorganism capable of reproduction coming into being of its own accord. Not of amino acids forming (an extremely simple process, hence why they can be found in abundance in outer space) and then basic RNA structures capable of division/reproduction forming. It would be a lie to say that the process by which the first, simple cells then arose, but do not reject science for faith merely because the former is a 'work-in-progress'.

 

of course you can provide evidence how science proves it wrong?

 

?

Are you being serious.

flesh formation begins before bone structure. Cellular division forming bone tissue takes place after flesh and organs begin developing

 

This argument is making me hungry

 

No surprise there chunky.

 

Is it possible that you could come up with something original?

 

Is it my imagination, or are TFWNN's answers getting shorter as he 'paints himself into a corner?'

...

 

I've never said that before so it is original.

 

I've heard it before so it's not original

 

No surprise there chunky...

 

Prove it.

 

I think you will find that First the bones form as cartilage models and then the muscles (flesh) develop around them from the somatic mesoderm.

 

its so the thick ****s can join in

 

Says the man who can't even type properly...

 

i know, fookin shoite at it