Off Topic GLP Progress

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Ive come off mine 3 or 4 times in my cycling 'career' when someone has checked I'm ok, the next question is 'hows your bike'....

First serious accident I have had on my bike. From what I have read Carbon Fibre frames are only designed to take stress in certain directions. One of my best mates who owned a bike shop for many years said he personally wouldn’t ride it again. He said stress fractures can be internal and not visible to the naked eye.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron Burguvdy
First serious accident I have had on my bike. From what I have read Carbon Fibre frames are only designed to take stress in certain directions. One of my best mates who owned a bike shop for many years said he personally wouldn’t ride it again. He said stress fractures can be internal and not visible to the naked eye.
Is the bike insured?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GLP
They checked. They are pleased to confirm I’m less of a **** and a very grateful human being. It’s made me realise life is just too short to embark on petty arguments.

Really, let's see. :bandit:


Cycling helmet played a significant part in ensuring I am still here today as it is cracked on the side. This was caused by double head impact with the car and the road. Fortunately the old coconut only had a bruise to show.


If the helmet cracked, it's a sign that it actually failed to do its job.
 
The two things are not necessarily linked. The lowest injury rates are in areas with the least helmet use.
I know
Very much depends on the type of roads, riders and drivers. Not many people wear them in Amsterdam (although more nowadays) but the roads are set up to provide cyclists with priority

In my opinion though they don't do any harm
 
  • Like
Reactions: GLP
The two things are not necessarily linked. The lowest injury rates are in areas with the least helmet use.

Let’s not derail the thread on helmet debates. Helmets are designed to do this rather than your skull. I for one am glad I was wearing one as I very much doubt I would be here if I wasn’t.
 
I know
Very much depends on the type of roads, riders and drivers. Not many people wear them in Amsterdam (although more nowadays) but the roads are set up to provide cyclists with priority

In my opinion though they don't do any harm

Any argument for wearing a helmet on a bike, is actually a stronger argument if the same logic is applied to pedestrians, and even car drivers. Would you advocate pedestrians wear helmets or in a car?

According to the experts, they are only of use at speeds and impact forces where head injuries wouldn't occur anyway. They can increase the risk of injury directly, through strap or rotation, and they increase the overall false perception that cycling is dangerous, reducing the numbers of cyclists. They give a false sense of safety, increasing risk taking by the wearer, and also cause drivers to go nearer, and increase the risk of injury.

Boxing withdrew head guards, as the net result was more head injuries.

If the money spent on helmets had been put into meaningful road sharing awareness, then safety would be far better served than through wearing a plastic cup.

EDIT: Just to add, another danger in making claims for helmets that the facts can't back up, is that it supports the claims for compulsory wearing, which have shown to reduce cycling as it gives the false perception that it is dangerous and increase the accident rate as it fools cyclists and drivers in to thinking they are protected.
 
Let’s not derail the thread on helmet debates. Helmets are designed to do this rather than your skull. I for one am glad I was wearing one as I very much doubt I would be here if I wasn’t.

Actually, the design doesn't claim that, and the Standards do not support that for any meaningful impact.
 
Whatever. The Police and Paramedics that tended to me on that day said it saved my life.

Neither group is an expert on the physics of helmet design. Their opinion, which is all that it is, is largely irrelevant.

Court cases have shown that not wearing a helmet cannot be deemed a contributory factor in compensation claims, as the best legal minds of the insurance industry couldn't demonstrate that helmets are effective at anything other than low impact at a short distance. ie a toddler walking.
 
Neither group is an expert on the physics of helmet design. Their opinion, which is all that it is, is largely irrelevant.

Court cases have shown that not wearing a helmet cannot be deemed a contributory factor in compensation claims, as the best legal minds of the insurance industry couldn't demonstrate that helmets are effective at anything other than low impact at a short distance. ie a toddler walking.
Dutch, leave it please.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GLP and DMD