I've not seen any official approach for Isak from Liverpool.
Have you?
No, and I don't see it happening tbh. Liverpool get the player when they're younger, ie Salah, Torres etc, rather than when they're the most expensive players in the world.
I've not seen any official approach for Isak from Liverpool.
Have you?
Yeah, because I really posted it because I thought it was legitIt is he's AIK fan.
Sorry to disappoint you, but that is a fake edit.

It's kind strange having all these clubs and their fans drooling over our players. The only downside is they seem to have figured out what a good player looks like.
The days of robbing them for the likes of a Carroll seem to be over, so I guess we'll do a Palace on them and string them along all summer, until they don't have time to do anything as an alternative.
I guess the interest is in the player Newcastle have picked up on the cheap……
I guess the interest is in the player Newcastle have picked up on the cheap……

I know its my club taking advantage of that loophole, but they really need to close it.Chelsea taking the absolute piss out of FFP / PSR
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cn91dg34pzqo

I know its my club taking advantage of that loophole, but they really need to close it.
Problem is, I dont think they can, under UK Business Law. But its dodgy as ****, thats the second time Chelsea have sold an asset, essentially to themselves.
Last year it was the hotel, now its the womens team![]()
Aye its daft really, I'd just let them crack on with it.They voted against closing this one.. I suspect that so many clubs are getting tied up in these rules that they all want an escape route.
Aye its daft really, I'd just let them crack on with it.
If there is one thing the last century of capitalism has taught us, its that billionaires will find a way to get what they want, one way or another.
Its all rather pointless.

Leicester away ticket bought
You're going down with Southampton![]()
I know its my club taking advantage of that loophole, but they really need to close it.
Problem is, I dont think they can, under UK Business Law. But its dodgy as ****, thats the second time Chelsea have sold an asset, essentially to themselves.
Last year it was the hotel, now its the womens team![]()
Can the women's team not buy the men's? Rinse and recheat.How much can there possibly be left? It's not like if the asset is moved around again it will help Chelsea. The trick can't be used forever.
