Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Can see Masters going soon though. Beggars belief that a multi billion pound organisation wouldn't consider the legality of regulations before introducing them. This will cost all clubs a huge wedge.

Wonder if Liverpool and United will get to vet the new person again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haslam
Libby said:
Yes completely different. Remarkable how after all this time people don't understand that.
Click to expand...

Do people actually understand the charges, got to be honest mate I've not paid the slightest bit of interest to any of it, I just see the headline and know it makes good Sucky bait - thought that was the rules on here. :bandit:
 
brb said:
Do people actually understand the charges, got to be honest mate I've not paid the slightest bit of interest to any of it, I just see the headline and know it makes good Sucky bait - thought that was the rules on here. :bandit:
Click to expand...
Don’t care or have any knowledge of the laws or rules. As long as I can laugh at fans who I don’t know but who support a club I detest. That’s the football spirit
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rorschach, Milk.., Diego and 1 other person
Rex Kramer. said:
The problem is they are separate, but when 115 are revenue based and city have been restricted on building revenue for 3 years via unlawful APT rules then it's basically a closed book.
Click to expand...

So what you are saying is the PL could be sued by clubs, not just Man City doing the suing, for restricting revenue through unlawful rules? :bandit:
 
  • Like
Reactions: haslam
brb said:
So what you are saying is the PL could be sued by clubs, not just Man City doing the suing, for restricting revenue through unlawful rules? :bandit:
Click to expand...

Absolutely, I mean have other clubs been refused certain sponsorships in the last 3 years?

Everton, Forest and Leicester might not be too pleased either.

Masters just talks out his arse, and he's clearly dug himself and the PL into a great big deep hole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: duggie2000 and brb
Rex Kramer. said:
The problem is they are separate, but when 115 are revenue based and city have been restricted on building revenue for 3 years via unlawful APT rules then it's basically a closed book.
Click to expand...

Most of the charges are unrelated to these rules though and predate them.
 
Libby said:
Most of the charges are unrelated to these rules though and predate them.
Click to expand...

Anything based on PSR in those 3 years will be up in smoke. I'm not sure about before though, but my guess is the Pls entire PSR case will collapse.
 
Rex Kramer. said:
Anything based on PSR in those 3 years will be up in smoke. I'm not sure about before though, but my guess is the Pls entire PSR case will collapse.
Click to expand...

Well that last bit is a different debate. I've long thought that the financial fair play regulations wouldn't stand up to legal scrutiny should somebody challenge them.

But the 115 are nothing to do with the APT stuff as far as I'm aware and predate those rules even existing.
 
brb said:
I think Libby is desperate for City to get charged...I can just sense it. <laugh>
Click to expand...

Not in the slightest, I just don't see how charges nothing to do with these rules will be affected by this decision.

I've always been against these rules and want them scrapped. In no other walks of life can owners be limited to how much they can invest into their business. It ****ing stinks.

Plus the meltdown when they get off will be hilarious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky, Diego and haslam
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back