Saints ST renewal prices released. I'd have to pay £140 extra for an equivalent seat or £100 extra for a worse one.
Robbing ****s. Good job I've no intention of renewing.
Robbing ****s. Good job I've no intention of renewing.
Dont act the div mateCity pay people to ref Saudi games and that is an advantage how exactly?

Dont act the div mate
If i pay you 20quid an hour an brb is giving you 3 pounds an hour for the same job.. whos your loyalty to?

And the guy who runs the saudi league is who....?But City aren't owned by Saudis you ****ing idiot![]()
And the guy who runs the saudi league is who....?
Citys owner


No it's not
Theyre ****ing based in Dubai and Saudi Arabia is a completely different country.
Sucky spouting all Muslims are the same ****![]()

Sucky being racist again, I'm shocked I tell yer, shocked.![]()
He'll probably smash it with the resources at his disposal.Hadn't realised Vincent Company had gone to Bayern Munich, quite some jump that and a risk for Bayern surely.
So we weren't buying success rather we were successful so generated more revenue unlike City who were taken over by a country and had huge sums pumped in to make them successful .Arguing about the need for FFP type rules is one thing ,though iirc it was the EFL who led the way with that ,but to equate the way we were and City now are financed is just bollox.Just out of interest ... why does 'giffting' matter? ... because somebody decided to introduce rules that massively benefit the world's elite clubs by stifling new entrants? - new entrants whose owners ain't ever going bust - Where's the 'Fair Play' in FFP if it more or less guarantees continued success for those elite clubs ...
My main point - all along - is that the rules as they stand are not fit for purpose - in no other industry is investment controlled (and stifled) to this extent - it's uncompetitive by definition ...
..
Hadn't realised Vincent Company had gone to Bayern Munich, quite some jump that and a risk for Bayern surely.
And the guy who runs the saudi league is who....?
Citys owner

Relegated with Burnley to one of the biggest jobs in football in a few weeks. Mad

So we weren't buying success rather we were successful so generated more revenue unlike City who were taken over by a country and had huge sums pumped in to make them successful .Arguing about the need for FFP type rules is one thing ,though iirc it was the EFL who led the way with that ,but to equate the way we were and City now are financed is just bollox.

Apparently Pep put in a good word at Bayern.
Bent af
It is, it is I tell ya![]()

No it's not
Theyre ****ing based in Dubai and Saudi Arabia is a completely different country.
Sucky spouting all Muslims are the same ****![]()

none of which has anything to do with the post you quoted .As I said - Pep has won 4 PL titles on the bounce with a squad costing the same as yours - in contrast you've only won the one since the new league competition evolved from the old football league
Seeking to hamstring the competition by moaning about them being able to spend as much as you must be a scouse thing - ...
Rest of the football World just accepts that those that spend the most have the best chance of success - same as it ever was - no point crying about it ...
If you really want 'Fair Play' simply apply a universal cap on transfers in a season (net spend) across the league - and get an annual guarantee from each club owner to underwrite that amount ... proper level playing field then![]()
fukin saudis runnin the entire game
you know the bayern chairman once ate a vindaloo
bent af![]()

none of which has anything to do with the post you quoted .
and where have i ever "cried" about it i just occasionally decide to point out the bollox of some peoples narrative