Can someone post up the ‘stamp of approval?’
Before we go any further, we might as well check that the bet was actually approved and verified.
Sure it’s somewhere…
Yes it was
Can someone post up the ‘stamp of approval?’
Before we go any further, we might as well check that the bet was actually approved and verified.
Sure it’s somewhere…
That’s good enough for me my friendYes it was
Ponky, please try and take this in - my decision to withdraw fron the wager had nothing to do with Pieguts post, but everything to do with yours... and your seeming inability to understand simple concepts.
Pieguts is not a poster I choose to engage with, partly because I find his posts don't really say much of interest, but mainly because him once putting B'Wood on ignore, not out of any personal beef, but simply because he found him irritating, marked him as 'not my kind of guy.' B'Wood may be a tediously boring **** and particularly poor poet, but did not warrant putting on ignore - in my view. That Pieguts has targeted me for holding that view is fine - but doesn't alter me finding him somewhat irrelevant as a poster - if he stopped posting on the site I'm not sure I'd notice - not sure anyone would, for that matter.
Now on to your post. You thought you'd be clever by inferring, whether in jest or seriously, that you would seek suggestions from other posters as to the avatar that would be given to me if you won the wager we had made. As I mentioned, I am not particulary fussed with avatar bets but some posters seem to love them, so I'll generally play along. But if the protagonist poster lacks the wit, intelligence, imagination or simple inclination, to come up with the forfeit themselves then, for me, there really is no point to having the wager - your post yesterday put you in one of those categories - others can decide which... but it means that you now join Munse in being a poster that I wouldn't take an avatar bet with, for those reasons.
For the avoidance of doubt, there is no bet welching - the game does not take place until tomorrow... so any claim of welching puts the claimant in the lack of intelligence category mentioned above.
There is no flounce - I'm here and happily doing what I always do - on my terms - as is my right.
Now I realise that this is quite a long post, so a shortened version will follow for those readers who prefer the shortened form.![]()

I have written reports for court cases that were shorter and more fun than this post![]()


I have written reports for court cases that were shorter and more fun than this post![]()


Shame the windy bit is BS. We fell out because I said he was a humourless prick and about 20,000 of his subsequent posts have proved me to be correctSo Fosse welched my bet because Pieguts gave him a bit of light bantz, and Fosse hates pie coz he once put Windy on ignore.
somebody call the old bill
10/10 Karen

Not sure how the Brighton keeper wasn't sent off there.
Not even referred! Prickford 2.0.![]()
10 paragraph flossier on how he's not a big massive welchin pussy.
Kden![]()

Not seen it but I reckon he didn’t touch him.

You've passed your PGMOL test and are now a qualified referee.![]()
Sounds like a bit too much running.
Not sitting in an office in Stockley Park watching the game in a one-eyed anti-Liverpool mode it isn't.![]()
Dem refs don’t give you nuffink