You must log in or register to see media
Not remotely controversial. Just crying because they didn't win.
Not seen much of Libs lately, wonder if he’s loved up with the Polish lass?
Could be.Not seen much of Libs lately, wonder if he’s loved up with the Polish lass?
Could be.
In unrelated news, this from the BBC:
Southampton have won the fewest points (four), scored the fewest goals (six) and conceded the most goals (25) out of any Premier Leaague team in 2021.
They'll probably be alright today. Got a couple of players back and the lineup looks a lot more balanced.They really haven’t been that bad though, they’re due a stroke of luck imo.
I remember you pissing yourself when we hit the woodwork twice v West ham last week ... karma bitch, karma![]()

Looks like I further jinxed the poor ****s.They'll probably be alright today. Got a couple of players back and the lineup looks a lot more balanced.
Having said that, Ings just got injured. That's not good.
They really haven’t been that bad though, they’re due a stroke of luck imo.
You must log in or register to see media
Not remotely controversial. Just crying because they didn't win.
While you waiting for fm to download init.It’s all down to Minamingmong now
I’m off to clean the car out
I’m old enough to remember them crying every year about only finishing 4th and winning the FA Cup.
You must log in or register to see images
He kicks it from about three inches away from his hand. Blatant attempt to buy a penalty. Correct decision.VAR got the second one right. It was off of his shoulder.
****ing brain fart for the first one though, stonewall pen.
He kicks it from about three inches away from his hand. Blatant attempt to buy a penalty. Correct decision.
Kante v Liverpool was more debatable and that wasn't given, so it's consistent:
You must log in or register to see media
Except it's not. Fulham's couldn't stand because an attacking player handled before the goal. There's no interpretation in it.If that's consistent then Fulham's equaliser should have stood against you the other night.
Almost identical scenario.
Except it's not. Fulham's couldn't stand because an attacking player handled before the goal. There's no interpretation in it.
You're just saying that because it chalked off the red card and penalty that you'd have incorrectly benefited from today!VAR is supposed to reducing incorrect decisions and it's just adding yet another layer of inconsistency.
The Pool one should have been a pen too.
I notice the rules are changing again next season, that'll clear it all up then ....


You're just saying that because it chalked off the red card and penalty that you'd have incorrectly benefited from today!![]()