I am. I'll be happy if all the players of every team other than West ham get injured for the season.I don’t think anyone has said they’re happy he’s potentially injured have they mate?
You should point out if they have.
I am. I'll be happy if all the players of every team other than West ham get injured for the season.I don’t think anyone has said they’re happy he’s potentially injured have they mate?
You should point out if they have.
It was a joke Sucky. We all know that Liverpool have never been the beneficiaries of any VAR decisions.Shouldn't have any problem showing us let's say... 15 of them then will ya?
This ^I think people should learn the rules. Yes it was a reckless foul that would've deserved a red had play been ongoing, but it was not violent conduct, therefore the preceding off-side negates the possiblilty of a red for the foul.

Show me then.It was a joke Sucky. We all know that Liverpool have never been the beneficiaries of any VAR decisions.
They get them straight from the ref
Turns up writing Drama novels on a Saturday night cos his team finally felt the wrong end of VAR.
Crying into his tin of Chicken Curry.![]()
Let’s not forget the cowardly stamp by Robertson yesterday on Allan. To be fair, I like that kind of ****ehouse move by a player.
But no mention in media.

Some people in here should be fuking ashamed of themselves, you know who you are.
What ****s me off is the hiding behind some ****ty loophole to bask in someone being injured possibly for a whole season.No shame in Shameless city, nor the snivelling dogs that have vicariously ridden their coat tails for decades.
You’re literally crying about people having the temerity to bring up the actual rules and that posters aren’t gloating about Van Dijk being crockedWhat ****s me off is the hiding behind some ****ty loophole to bask in someone being injured possibly for a whole season.
Disgraceful ****, obviously not one will have the balls to just say they are happy vvd is ****ed.
Pussys mate.

What ****s me off is the hiding behind some ****ty loophole to bask in someone being injured possibly for a whole season.
Disgraceful ****, obviously not one will have the balls to just say they are happy vvd is ****ed.
Pussys mate.
It's now become a stamp? This whataboutery is hilarious- like saying Virgil deserved it because he'd committed two minor fouls before the assault. Does that mean Allan deserved the electric chair for the eighty six fouls he committed before being booked?![]()
post a link to the rule theres a good lad .I think people should learn the rules. Yes it was a reckless foul that would've deserved a red had play been ongoing, but it was not violent conduct, therefore the preceding off-side negates the possiblilty of a red for the foul.
Who’s said that they’re pleased like? Not me.
It’s not even been confirmed has it? An extra inhaler and a supersized juice and he’ll likely be back next week.
i'm fairly certain some blues were calling for the same for Son after the Gomes incident .no, what I am saying is that either foul in his attempt to intimidate could have caused serious injury. They were deliberately aimed at our two best forward players.
one clumsy challenge and an unfortunate injury later to u have reds wanting Pickford banned for the length of time time VVD is out!
i'm fairly certain some blues were calling for the same for Son after the Gomes incident .
post a link to the rule theres a good lad .