Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
So Chelsea will have spent about £275m since they won the league last season.

Morata £70m
Rudiger £35m
Drinky £35m
Bakayoko £40m
Zappacosta £25m
Barkley £15m
Palmeiri & Dzeko £55m

United have spent £140m give or take £10m in the same time.

City must be about £270m as well when Laporte arrives.

Looks like a bad year for Chelsea on the outgoings front.
 
Dzeko will be a decent signing for the chavs albeit on a short term basis. He ain’t going be tearing up trees but he’s a proven PL player and would have scored a lot more goals for city if Aguero hadn’t been ahead of him.

There was a time when I’d hoped arsenal would go in for him, but Giroud is probably on a par and possibly a bit better on the deck.

Anyway compared to the ****e that Chelsea were looking at, Carroll, Crouch etc. Then dzeko is a proper signing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ginger Marks
PISKIE said:
Dzeko will be a decent signing for the chavs albeit on a short term basis. He ain’t going be tearing up trees but he’s a proven PL player and would have scored a lot more goals for city if Aguero hadn’t been ahead of him.

There was a time when I’d hoped arsenal would go in for him, but Giroud is probably on a par and possibly a bit better on the deck.

Anyway compared to the ****e that Chelsea were looking at, Carroll, Crouch etc. Then dzeko is a proper signing.
Click to expand...

No bias from me.

Id rather Dzeko in my team than Giroud. Dzeko is more clinical infront of goal, and he's not quite as slow.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back