Only the bet was stated as a season not a year, and he knows this so that’d make him a **** for trying to **** stir on this tedious bollocks for the umpteenth time. He can suck me salty balls for it now.
I got screenshots of the bet mate, stamped by spurly, clearly says a year. You wanna see em again? And its only tedious cos you lost fam
So how it should work is that both of you should outline the conditions of bet, to the best of your understanding, then Spurly needs to confirm it as he understands it, then both parties need to sign off on Spurlys final T&Cs.
We did this before, and you know I’m right, I’m not doing it again, as I proper can’t be arsed. The matter is closed.
K mate no worries. Ive got another get out bet for you, one last chance to save yourself.... RUSSIAN PREMIER LEAGUE Sochi vs Ural 17:00 Predict the correct score and all the scorers, and the goal times and you shall win your freedom. If you get it wrong add control of your title to our previous bet terms. What you sayin?
Maybe, as a side to Spurly Bet4Bantz thread we should have a Bod's Supreme Court thread, where people can appeal the results of their bets and I weigh the evidence and make a ruling. Im kidding btw, cba. But if someone else wants to do it......
Crying about bets is part of the appeal of the bets imo. The OG bet with me and HIAG was a month. He welched it and I managed to string that **** out for 4 years ffs
Same with Fosse. He lost a succession of bets to Munse, cried about somebody putting up a picture of Saville and flounced for a couple of months. Came back and gave everybody a list of his principles, but was comfortable with Hitler