It's a month bro ...
It’s until the empire is re-formed in full.
Nobody cares what the Jews think mate.
This is the problem though, it still comes down to subjective interpretations because there's always going to be a human interpreting the intent.
From what I've seen of VAR, it hasn't ironed out the big mistakes that refs make. It's just added another layer of subjectivity.
Unlucky mate.
Bro you trippin... it was defo a week.
Nice of you to volunteer for a month though, cheers.
I'd disagree there ... we don't discuss the decisions that VAR gets correct...
... if you narrow and clarify the areas open to interpretation then the problem decreases.
I don't think the technology will ever be rescinded... so you have e to make it work to the best of its capabilities... all the whinging in the world is not gonna change it.
Again though this is the problem, because at the end of the day it's just another human ref making a subjective decision.
The whole idea of VAR was supposed to 'narrow and clarify the areas open to interpretation', but you can't escape the human equation.
You can train the human equation
You can train the human equation
Again though this is the problem, because at the end of the day it's just another human ref making a subjective decision.
The whole idea of VAR was supposed to 'narrow and clarify the areas open to interpretation', but you can't escape the human equation.
Basically the idea is that to make the technology work we have to rewrite the entire rulebook.
Almost makes you wonder how we managed for over a century if the game was so broken.
You can give the refs as much training as you like, but you'll never eradicate human subjectivity mate.
Basically the idea is that to make the technology work we have to rewrite the entire rulebook.
Almost makes you wonder how we managed for over a century if the game was so broken.

Which is why VAR was brought in ... to reduce it as much as can be acheived ... that remains the goal ...