Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
That's that then. I'm quite excited about this team.. Couple of decent signings in the summer and we'll be a real force at the top. Pub it is.
 
I have said it before but after giving the city offside v West ham, the spurs one v Leicester and the Sheffield United one v us they are going to have to keep ****ing teams over cos the president has been set and you can not change the rules until the end of the season...the offside ruling are a joke.
 
remembercolinlee said:
I have said it before but after giving the city offside v West ham, the spurs one v Leicester and the Sheffield United one v us they are going to have to keep ****ing teams over cos the president has been set and you can not change the rules until the end of the season...the offside ruling are a joke.
Click to expand...


The attacker used to get benefit of the doubt. The reason people go to games is, essentially, to see goals, right?

VAR rules seems hell bent on finding reasons to disallow them.

Unless it's ****ing scouse ****s in red of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD, Bald Archie, Libby and 5 others
Chief said:
It generally works for your lot mate!
Click to expand...
VAR giveth VAR taketh away .
Never wanted VAR and nothing i have seen has changed my mind .
On today i could argue that if TAA committed a foul for their free kick then Ayew committed a foul on Lovren so decision was right but this is the problem with VAR as so many decisions are subjective .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bumps
Chief said:
The attacker used to get benefit of the doubt. The reason people go to games is, essentially, to see goals, right?

VAR rules seems hell bent on finding reasons to disallow them.

Unless it's ****ing scouse ****s in red of course.
Click to expand...

saucer of milk for Chief...
 
Solid_Air 2 said:
VAR giveth VAR taketh away .
Never wanted VAR and nothing i have seen has changed my mind .
On today i could argue that if TAA committed a foul for their free kick then Ayew committed a foul on Lovren so decision was right but this is the problem with VAR as so many decisions are subjective .
Click to expand...

The subjective ones should be left alone, that's the problem. We can argue about stuff like that in the pub after.

They're getting the ones wrong that should be obvious though. Off side should be easy. Not someone's toe, or elbow.

If it's level, give the goal for **** sake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schlem Boogerman and remembercolinlee
Chief said:
The attacker used to get benefit of the doubt. The reason people go to games is, essentially, to see goals, right?

VAR rules seems hell bent on finding reasons to disallow them.

Unless it's ****ing scouse ****s in red of course.
Click to expand...

They need a clear daylight rule...so it's only offside if there is a clear daylight betwee the two player's upper bodies.
Either that or they get 10 seconds to look so it is only clear mistakes that are changed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FosseFilberto and Schlem Boogerman
remembercolinlee said:
They need a clear daylight rule...so it's only offside if there is a clear daylight betwee the two player's upper bodies.
Either that or they get 10 seconds to look so it is only clear mistakes that are changed.
Click to expand...
Unlike that goal the other week that was offside by a toe<laugh>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back