That may be correct, but getting rid when we did was yet another poor decision. We were going in to a new season on the back of a 'success'. The players - most bang average - were at least by and large with him I think and the risk of giving him a couple of months was maybe a lot lower than what has transpired.
I'm not saying Ange was a good coach by the way, and in all likelihood we would started the PL season as we finished the last. Just that the optics and justification to get rid would have been stronger.
But heh - why would this club be expected to make a good decision on the playing side?![]()
Last season wasn’t a success though
Spurs finished 17th and lost 22 league games with 38 points.
I don’t buy into the whole he chucked League games to focus on Europa.
Sacking Ange was the right thing to do, Thomas Frank in hindsight wasn’t the right replacement but I don’t remember many at the time saying that.
