Gazza

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Well again it sounds more like you're unhappy at the size of the piece rather than the accuracy.

About these four paragraphs, do you disagree that they happened in the way he described? I'm sure they all happened.

Are you really trying to compare him to Lennon? I don't think they have similar history, except women trouble.

Jesus Christ, you're nearly as bad as Medro.

Yes, I compared him to Lennon - it was quite explicit - they both barracked referees - quite why you made some leap about them "having similar history" from me DIRECTLY comparing their combatitive style from is mysterious.

Those four particular paragraphs (the ones before the photo of him celebrating scoring against Scotland) are eulogising the same "cheeky chappie" image he had during his playing days (after the article saying it would concentrate on the football). I feel that mentioning stuff about fish and Gordon Durie is perhaps of the same relevancy as mentioning that he's a clatty **** that ****es in baths.

They all happened - not one mention was made of the negative aspects of his on-pitch persona and was totally relevant in terms of the player he was.

Also, Gazza's encouraged alcoholism at Rangers (The team that drinks together...) is mentioned in a sort of "he enjoyed a hauf" manner.

There's no question about length of content or inclusion of content - it's about non-inclusion and tone.

I can't believe I need to spell this out for you.

You're not this daft - it's wilful and this entire post I've made was completely unnecessary given the previous ones.
 
So no you were not at the game.

That's still the nearest thing to a straight answer you've ever given.

Imagine living your life like that, man <doh>

"Medro, I'm putting the tea on, do you want chips?"

"So, what you are saying is that you DO NOT want chips? Are you anti-chips?"

"No, I'm just asking if you want chips."

"So, you confirm that you hate chips, thanks for that."


Must be ****ing depressing living your whole life like a particularly precocious female politician without having an actual vagina to play with.
 
Jesus Christ, you're nearly as bad as Medro.

Yes, I compared him to Lennon - it was quite explicit - they both barracked referees - quite why you made some leap about them "having similar history" from me DIRECTLY comparing their combatitive style from is mysterious.

Those four particular paragraphs (the ones before the photo of him celebrating scoring against Scotland) are eulogising the same "cheeky chappie" image he had during his playing days (after the article saying it would concentrate on the football). I feel that mentioning stuff about fish and Gordon Durie is perhaps of the same relevancy as mentioning that he's a clatty **** that ****es in baths.

They all happened - not one mention was made of the negative aspects of his on-pitch persona and was totally relevant in terms of the player he was.

Also, Gazza's encouraged alcoholism at Rangers (The team that drinks together...) is mentioned in a sort of "he enjoyed a hauf" manner.

There's no question about length of content or inclusion of content - it's about non-inclusion and tone.

I can't believe I need to spell this out for you.

You're not this daft - it's wilful and this entire post I've made was completely unnecessary given the previous ones.

Have you met devadvocate?...

I only asked why you disagreed with the article, I think it's fair to say that pretty much everything he says is true and that although other parts have been missed out, i don't know if that's down to his desired length for the piece or his bias.

As for the Lennon comparison, when I mentioned history I meant more along the lines of things that were similar in their careers, I don't recall him sneering at refs much to be honest and certainly not more than normal if so.
 
Have you met devadvocate?...

I only asked why you disagreed with the article, I think it's fair to say that pretty much everything he says is true and that although other parts have been missed out, i don't know if that's down to his desired length for the piece or his bias.

As for the Lennon comparison, when I mentioned history I meant more along the lines of things that were similar in their careers, I don't recall him sneering at refs much to be honest and certainly not more than normal if so.

Yeah, I don't think the three previous A4 sized ****ing posts I gave disagreeing with it earlier were quite enough, eh?