Well I don’t quite see the benefit of a buyer trying to inflate the price of an asset they are buying. That is normally the sellers job.
I suspect it suited Ellis to dress the sale up as a price of £40m rather than £15m with the repayment of his loan as it was less embarrassing. What SD thought he was playing at claiming that he didn’t need the parachute payments I don’t know but let’s assume it was bravado as well.
Either way, I just don’t see it as material. The main issue was that you had a League One club with premier league wage contracts running at a loss of £25m a year. They have managed tk hack the costs back but even with an extra £16m injected from SD and FPP, there is still no light at the end of the tunnel.
I asked a simple enough question Bob. If he negotiated a price of £80m with a buyer in cash, how much of that £80m would he have left to the club?
Because the short answer is none. He would have taken all of that cash for himself.
Yet in the reverse situation, people make excuse after excuse for him to leave the club in dire straits rather than paying debts that he claimed he was paying the whole time.
So yes, it is material, because the reason we are in this situation, facing a third successive season in League One, is because we have been unable to make progress on the pitch because there was no money available. We've stripped everything back, which is fine, but we are barely competitive in this division and that is at odds with the amount of money we should have been able to spend on the club when £40m+ has come in over the last 2 seasons.
You're just trotting out the same PR lines as Charlie, talking about how we were a failing club before the saviours Donald and Methven took over. Totally neglecting that there were other options.
Last edited:
