FPP to take full control

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I also pulled you up before smug said anything about FPP not allowing him to speak to anyone. Read back on the posts and stop backtracking, I’ll point you in the direction of post 240

Yeah, that's why I responded and showed you what led me to that conclusion. You, on the other hand, didn't even read that document before you formed your opinion. Can you see the difference?

Thought not.
 
:D I assume smug will be reporting this, being the righteous man he is.

Good on you pal, you just believe that if 5 people all believe their own interpretation, and can't give a plausible reason why 'attempt to' differs markedly from 'sell' that they're right. Nothing wrong with following the crowd without question and then shouting down anyone that disagrees and calling them thick as pigshit and a ****er, questioning their ability to run a business, or even, if you take a leaf out of say, @Smug in Boots's book, you could tell me to **** off and die, then defend your right to do so, but then edit the post to get rid of it.

I must have missed why BumbleBee was banned btw? Was it purely for disagreeing with you smug, or was it because he told someone to **** off and die?
You’re not right in the head you mate, having a discussion with me and bringing other people into it to satisfy your existence on this board and quoting supposed messages. Is it not possible that the people pointing out things that you have said on here are right or are you one of these blokes who turn up at a quiz night and think they know every answer to every question but get everyone wrong. As I said before this kind of thing belongs over the road, to me you’re just an idiot and someone who if it wasn’t on this board would walk 100 miles in the opposite direction then stay and be in your company and listen to your inane ramblings
 
:D I assume smug will be reporting this, being the righteous man he is.

Good on you pal, you just believe that if 5 people all believe their own interpretation, and can't give a plausible reason why 'attempt to' differs markedly from 'sell' that they're right. Nothing wrong with following the crowd without question and then shouting down anyone that disagrees and calling them thick as pigshit and a ****er, questioning their ability to run a business, or even, if you take a leaf out of say, @Smug in Boots's book, you could tell me to **** off and die, then defend your right to do so, but then edit the post to get rid of it.

I must have missed why BumbleBee was banned btw? Was it purely for disagreeing with you smug, or was it because he told someone to **** off and die?

I believe i did that. You just appear not to view it as plausible it would seem
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nordic
Yeah, that's why I responded and showed you what led me to that conclusion. You, on the other hand, didn't even read that document before you formed your opinion. Can you see the difference?

Thought not.
I didnt have to read the document because it’s not what you said, you said he had to get permission off FPP before he spoke to anyone
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots
You’re not right in the head you mate, having a discussion with me and bringing other people into it to satisfy your existence on this board and quoting supposed messages. Is it not possible that the people pointing out things that you have said on here are right or are you one of these blokes who turn up at a quiz night and think they know every answer to every question but get everyone wrong. As I said before this kind of thing belongs over the road, to me you’re just an idiot and someone who if it wasn’t on this board would walk 100 miles in the opposite direction then stay and be in your company and listen to your inane ramblings

Look at the ****e you've called me before you start throwing around accusations. You want me to dig all of the insults over the last few hours out and then compare with what I've said?
 
My depth of knowledge knows that you being a business man you are thick as pigshit and cannot understand when loads of posters on here are telling you are wrong and you still spout ****e. How you run a company is beyond me cause you come across here as a know nowt ****a

I also pulled you up before smug said anything about FPP not allowing him to speak to anyone. Read back on the posts and stop backtracking, I’ll point you in the direction of post 240

"How you run a company is beyond me."


I'd take all that with a pinch of salt tbh.

He claims to have discussed these things with Grumpy Old Man ...

... when I spoke to GOM recently he said he'd never spoken to him, ever.
 
I didnt have to read the document because it’s not what you said, you said he had to get permission off FPP before he spoke to anyone

No, again, because you can't read, I said he needed the permission of FPP before he could negotiate with them. There's a difference.
 
"How you run a company is beyond me."

I'd take all that with a pinch of salt tbh.

He claims to have discussed these things with Grumpy Old Man ...

... when I spoke to GOM recently he said he'd never spoken to him, ever.

I have spoken to GOM about the club on RTG publicly a number of times, as recently as a few weeks ago iirc so before you start casting aspersions to a man who is clearly a bit beyond reading things for himself, how about I knock this one on the head:

https://www.readytogo.net/smb/threa...hursday-evening.1499950/page-28#post-31008431

Apology accepted.
 
:D Haway man, what are you doing? I'm trying to be nice, but this is really weird.

Look at the original post. Look at what I've posted since. I haven't backtracked on anything, in fact all I've done is show to those who asked why what I said is a fact.

You're the one trying to be disingenuous about what you said, pretending you didn't question whether they had to get consent to negotiate. That's exactly what you said, and I proved exactly that by citing the agreement between Madrox and FPP. What more fact do you want?
You must log in or register to see images
 
No, again, because you can't read, I said he needed the permission of FPP before he could negotiate with them. There's a difference.

I wished I couldn’t read what you write as I wouldn’t be able to see the ****e you post, backtracking again I see.
 
You said you'd spoken to him.

Right, on the forum, which if you wanted clarity on, you could have asked rather than sly around trying to somehow catch me out and now getting shown up spreading ****e. Because as you can see, we did speak. So hopefully that answers your questions. Amazing how you try to go ad hominem so often, I could pull out literally dozens of insults, insinuations and aspersions you've thrown my way, yet you have the gall to pretend to report a post saying someone is not great, a few days after telling someone to **** off and die.

You're a massive hypocrite and I've received more than a few PM's elsewhere that indicate there are a number of people who agree but feel that if they stand up to your bullying, they themselves are more likely to be punished.

Interesting, anyway, side note, where is BumbleBee?
 
Look at the ****e you've called me before you start throwing around accusations. You want me to dig all of the insults over the last few hours out and then compare with what I've said?
Only thing I’ve accused you of is talking ****e, you make it easy for people. You’re so pigheaded that you’re blind to see what you have said. Why can’t you just admit when so many people are telling you it was wrong what you said and stop backtracking
 
No, again, because you can't read, I said he needed the permission of FPP before he could negotiate with them. There's a difference.
Let me explain it again and i'll try to break it down even more for you seeing as you thought that my last explanation wasn't plausible.

Looking to sell: Considering a sale and the viabilty of said sale. For example, what is the market value? What will i do for an income after said sale and is it substantial enough for me to maintain my lifestyle? Feasability studies .Will the sale price result in a gain or a loss for me?

Attempting to sell: Agreeing a deal which then falls through

Selling: Completing the sale

For those not in business it's similar in the housing market, purchase/sale of a car.

Looking to sell the house: Self reasonings for sale (too small, don't like area, profitability etc.)

Attempting to sell: Listing house with real estate agent, signing contracts etc.

Selling: Completing the sale

it's not rocket science.
 
Let me explain it again and i'll try to break it down even more for you seeing as you thought that my last explanation wasn't plausible.

Looking to sell: Considering a sale and the viabilty of said sale. For example, what is the market value? What will i do for an income after said sale and is it substantial enough for me to maintain my lifestyle? Feasability studies .Will the sale price result in a gain or a loss for me?

Attempting to sell: Agreeing a deal which then falls through

Selling: Completing the sale

For those not in business it's similar in the housing market, purchase/sale of a car.

Looking to sell the house: Self reasonings for sale (too small, don't like area, profitability etc.)

Attempting to sell: Listing house with real estate agent, signing contracts etc.

Selling: Completing the sale

it's not rocket science.

I like what you've done here mate, I really do and it appeals to my nature (Love a list) like you wouldn't believe, but I think you've got a massive grey area between 'sell' and 'looking to sell' that they have inhabited, and I see that as 'attempt to sell'.

I would view a sale that falls through as a sale, for these purposes, because ultimately they don't have to make any covenant that protects them against a sale that they don't want, that subsequently doesn't go ahead for another reason.
 
Right, on the forum, which if you wanted clarity on, you could have asked rather than sly around trying to somehow catch me out and now getting shown up spreading ****e. Because as you can see, we did speak. So hopefully that answers your questions. Amazing how you try to go ad hominem so often, I could pull out literally dozens of insults, insinuations and aspersions you've thrown my way, yet you have the gall to pretend to report a post saying someone is not great, a few days after telling someone to **** off and die.

You're a massive hypocrite and I've received more than a few PM's elsewhere that indicate there are a number of people who agree but feel that if they stand up to your bullying, they themselves are more likely to be punished.

Interesting, anyway, side note, where is BumbleBee?

You've claimed, more than once, to have spoken to GOM ...

.... you haven't, he's a good friend and laughed at the idea when I asked him at MK Dons.

You've only ever posted on a forum just as I've posted now.

I've never actually spoken to you.

What you were doing was trying to trick people into believing you were speaking to someone who's actually corrected many of your errors.
 
I like what you've done here mate, I really do and it appeals to my nature (Love a list) like you wouldn't believe, but I think you've got a massive grey area between 'sell' and 'looking to sell' that they have inhabited, and I see that as 'attempt to sell'.

I would view a sale that falls through as a sale, for these purposes, because ultimately they don't have to make any covenant that protects them against a sale that they don't want, that subsequently doesn't go ahead for another reason.
And that in itself is enough for them to be allowed to talk to people.

Generally in law if a contract can be reasonably interpreted 2 ways then the ruling will tend to go the way who is adversely effected most by the contract.

In criminal law attempt is defined as "An attempt to commit a crime,is an endeavor to accomplish it,carried beyond mere preparation,but falling short of execution o ftheultimate design,in any part of it.
 
You've claimed, more than once, to have spoken to GOM ...

.... you haven't, he's a good friend and laughed at the idea when I asked him at MK Dons.

You've only ever posted on a forum just as I've posted now.

I've never actually spoken to you.

What you were doing was trying to trick people into believing you were speaking to someone who's actually corrected many of your errors.

Christ, heaven forbid someone uses the wrong wording around you. I said spoken, I wouldn't have thought twice about whether that would be used against me. For clarity, I discussed it with GOM a number of times.

Happy?