not too much damage to the league position but MM has to sort out this away form/formation/starting 11 2 home games now to hopefully get back on track but followed by 2 away games.
Away from home we are prettty dire - by choice. I cannot see the point of not attacking teams. At least try and give them something to worry about. Noone on the bench, and a defensive and negative formation. If this is Malky's idea of trying to win a game it's a very strange one. The idea seems to be to hope for a lucky goal and then close the game or pray that we can hold the 0-0. With these tactics we will not beat a decent side away from home all season (by the way, Forest were not a decent side, we gave them two goals, they did little else). As at Ipswich we threatened nothing in the first half, 2-0 down. Same second half, no changes. What did Malky expect to happen? Only he knows. Soon it was 3-0. Then he left it for over 20 more minutes to gradually make some changes. One of his coaching staff must have told him we were losing. Noone came on for Conway, and changed the game. We loooked like scoring several times, and could have had four headed goals in the space of 25 minutes. Hudson and Smith both missed good chances, Noone ahd a header, Rudy had a great header tipped over. Helgusson looked a far better player when Noone and Rudy came on and we changed our approach. Conclusion: we need a different manager for away games. One with some balls. I'm not going to support City away again until I see some evidence of a change in approach - it's just too depressing, it makes me angry. We cannot rely on winning 23 home games this season - it is not going to happen. I hate to say it, but again Superkev looked nothing like the player he was a few years ago.
