Forest may move from their rented ground ...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Smug in Boots

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
68,901
165,020
113
70
Upper Largo Scotland
... will Newcastle be next.

Both clubs are in a difficult predicament in that they don't own the land they play on.

Newcastle have to pretend they love their weird ground, because they can't improve it or move, and call it 'The cathedral on the hill' ...

... in reality it's more like a Mosque on a slight incline.

If they left SJP they'd have to demolish the stadium and return it as it was when they first rented it. The cost of demolition would be huge, although Sunderland supporters would probably do it for nothing, and they'd have to buy the new land then pay for a brand new stadium. The Saudis are unlikely to commit to that while they weigh up whether or not Newcastle are worth the bother.

Forest are bluffing and threatening to leave the City Ground ...

... in reality they're backing themselves into a really shiity corner.

Nottingham Forest could quit City Ground over council rent row

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-68439547
 
  • Like
Reactions: Young Ted and DH4
... will Newcastle be next.

Both clubs are in a difficult predicament in that they don't own the land they play on.

Newcastle have to pretend they love their weird ground, because they can't improve it or move, and call it 'The cathedral on the hill' ...

... in reality it's more like a Mosque on a slight incline.

If they left SJP they'd have to demolish the stadium and return it as it was when they first rented it. The cost of demolition would be huge, although Sunderland supporters would probably do it for nothing, and they'd have to buy the new land then pay for a brand new stadium. The Saudis are unlikely to commit to that while they weigh up whether or not Newcastle are worth the bother.

Forest are bluffing and threatening to leave the City Ground ...

... in reality they're backing themselves into a really shiity corner.

Nottingham Forest could quit City Ground over council rent row

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-68439547
The whole thing about Newcastle having to pay demolition costs etc on the st James site is a bit of a moot point really. Any developer buying this valuable site will have to commit to the demolition to win the bid, so it will all get swallowed up in the fine print, the land belongs to the City Freemen and ultimately the council, demolition costs will be a tiny fraction of the budget on this very valuable piece of real estate. Step forward Mr.Jamie Reuben , how fortunate that NUFC have on their board of directors, a property development magnate who is deeply involved with Newcastle Council on a number of major developments within the local area, his expertise will be invaluable in the sale of Gallowgate, and the relocation of the club to a new site, even possibly one of the numerous sites that the Reuben brothers have been aquiring around the vicinity in recent years. How bloody lucky is that eh?
 
The whole thing about Newcastle having to pay demolition costs etc on the st James site is a bit of a moot point really. Any developer buying this valuable site will have to commit to the demolition to win the bid, so it will all get swallowed up in the fine print, the land belongs to the City Freemen and ultimately the council, demolition costs will be a tiny fraction of the budget on this very valuable piece of real estate. Step forward Mr.Jamie Reuben , how fortunate that NUFC have on their board of directors, a property development magnate who is deeply involved with Newcastle Council on a number of major developments within the local area, his expertise will be invaluable in the sale of Gallowgate, and the relocation of the club to a new site, even possibly one of the numerous sites that the Reuben brothers have been aquiring around the vicinity in recent years. How bloody lucky is that eh?

I don't believe it's within the gift of the Freemen to sell the land.

Having said that you're right that there are some corrupt, powerful and wealthy people involved with NUFC ...

... and Newcastle Council have a history of backhanders going back to the 60's.
 
Last edited:
The whole thing about Newcastle having to pay demolition costs etc on the st James site is a bit of a moot point really. Any developer buying this valuable site will have to commit to the demolition to win the bid, so it will all get swallowed up in the fine print, the land belongs to the City Freemen and ultimately the council, demolition costs will be a tiny fraction of the budget on this very valuable piece of real estate. Step forward Mr.Jamie Reuben , how fortunate that NUFC have on their board of directors, a property development magnate who is deeply involved with Newcastle Council on a number of major developments within the local area, his expertise will be invaluable in the sale of Gallowgate, and the relocation of the club to a new site, even possibly one of the numerous sites that the Reuben brothers have been aquiring around the vicinity in recent years. How bloody lucky is that eh?

Good information that. Also, when we Sunderland feel the benefit from the Saudi takeover? After all it was going to be food for the reeejun, to the banks of the tees.
 
I don't believe it's within the gift of the Freemen to sell the land.

Having said that you're right that there are some corrupt, powerful and wealthy people involved with NUFC ...

... and Newcastle Council have a history of backhanders going back to the 60's.

Just look at the plot of land that the Seaburn Inn is built on. Prime land in a developing area deemed to be worth by an independent, and bought for.... £1000... to build a hotel on.