Jimmy Case I agree with but he was not in that squad, I asked name a weaker squad any year we were in the top flight. To boot Hurlock was a damn good effective player and a lot of pros have said that also.
Any chance of you people not using the reply with quote feature, pointless having an ignor function if you keep quoting the trolls original posts. If you need to refer to a particular post use the # message number on the top right of each post please.
Again, very much like Gomarchingin, you take a single word from a longish post and pick at it. You're remarkably similar in argument style. Vin
Again I was going to add my 5 pence worth...again though I see the mods at last realised who was posting. Just to put a different prospective on things that have been bandied about. When you get a troll who continually rocks the boat. Mods start to get complaints. Usually there is an exchange of Pm's, it is rare they will agree, but the perpetrator are put into the picture as to other peoples complaints. Usually this will go on over the course of a week or two. By this time official complaints have been launched and the mods are asked what are they are doing about it. In all this time exchanges will have been made by pm with the person causing problems. When the final decision is made this is usually the result of continued trolling and most likely a straw that has broken the camels back. So on the day it may look as if it is something minor that has caused a problem when in fact the whole saga has been going on for some time. This is worth pointing out and remembering
At least, as he keeps coming back (I think this is his second re-registration) it means there's a higher chance he'll be banned for longer.
Unfortunately he is another that considers he is above the rules...........Everytime he comes back he will be banned as far as I'm aware. The same for banana they like to be sure though before banning anyone.
It's OK it looks like the problem has been resolved anyway, I have been guilty in the past so it was the pot calling the kettle noir.
You are not reading properly. I know Case wasn't in that squad. I was merely saying that Case was twice the player Hurlock was in that he could do a little more than break legs. All players are effective, it is a case of what they are effective at. Hurlock was a poor replacement for Case. I will stand by that early nineties squad escaped relegation several times purely on the basis of a top keep and top centre back pairing with MLT being able to make and score so many. 4 players kept us up for 3 or 4 years. You cannot do that these days and this squad is much more than that. My last post on this thread, I've given my opinion, you disgaree. No Problem.