Financial, erm, Stuff
- Thread starter FadgewackeR
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
They will work with shareholders where possible and if the had them bang to rights they'd have done something.
The fact is they haven't got anything on them and that's good because it's a potential way to increase wiggle room for other clubs.
Not necessarily but they might go down that route if needed. The rules can't stop clubs selling things.
It’s noticeable that Man City are now building a big hotel and already have a 50% share in the new concert arena on the Etihad Campus.
Presumably they have also spotted the loophole that you can build assets that don’t count against PSR then flog them off if you are in a PSR hole, and add the sale to the bottom line.
Presumably they have also spotted the loophole that you can build assets that don’t count against PSR then flog them off if you are in a PSR hole, and add the sale to the bottom line.
For some strange reason some of our fans are active in wanting PSR loopholes to be eliminated and punished.
Newcastle haven't bothered with loopholes and that's probably because they just haven't needed too, but if they ever do perhaps they will.
Ahh see this is what I mean now the cat is out of the bag everyone will be doing it, maybe people were waiting to see what trouble chelsea got into and now there is no PSR issue they'll all start doing it.
In that we are the most likely to be building new next we could build a few hotels and car parks with the new stadium right and just immediately flog them to ourselves. Plus lets sell the womens team this summer, ok they aren't five time consecutive champions but they have to be worth 80m right?
Precisely why Newcastle MUST leave SJP and build something else.
We’ll build an empire like City, we won’t be as short term as Chelsea who are one bad season from a fire sale.
when it comes to questions around transfer windows, but I realised very early that he's simply telling the truth.
Newcastle will do nothing this month in terms of incomings.
At least the days of people telling themselves it was all just lies to keep prices down have stopped.
Newcastle will do nothing this month in terms of incomings.
At least the days of people telling themselves it was all just lies to keep prices down have stopped.
Last edited:
They need CL football but are the one team ahead of us I'm confident of overtaking currently with their form.
No win in their last 5 PL games vs Bournemouth, Palace, Fulham, Ipswich and Everton...
Well given the news today of Haalands contract being exactly 115 months, I would say it's safe to assume they are definitely not losing their first case. Beautiful ****housery
pif now own the old barker and stone house site. It will be turned into hospitality if we stay where we are.
Or Student accommodation. Apparently, we’re a bit short as a City on that front.
It's clear match day revenue is the easiest fix whether the newcastle supporters trust can afford future prices or not.. Unfortunately they will either have to cough up or move over for the next generation.
You must log in or register to see images
Creeping on up, 20th in '23, 17th in '24.
Agreed match day needs to be increased - which means a new stadium with lots of corporate seating and more seats for the tourists to buy their half half scarves and fridge magnets probably - but also the commercial side of it, we are 3 or 4 times behind the 6 ahead of us (from our league). Again a new stadium with a sponsor paying top bucks for it and a training ground will boost our revenues hugely and bring us in line with those above.
Interesting that City aren't pulling up any trees on the Matchday income but their commercial revenue is huge in comparison and 10% more than anyone else in the league...
Agreed match day needs to be increased - which means a new stadium with lots of corporate seating and more seats for the tourists to buy their half half scarves and fridge magnets probably - but also the commercial side of it, we are 3 or 4 times behind the 6 ahead of us (from our league). Again a new stadium with a sponsor paying top bucks for it and a training ground will boost our revenues hugely and bring us in line with those above.
Interesting that City aren't pulling up any trees on the Matchday income but their commercial revenue is huge in comparison and 10% more than anyone else in the league...
PSG's numbers looked rigged to ****. For a club in a poor league (in both senses of the word) with no European success to show for it, those numbers seem excessive to say the least. To put it into context, the Parc Des Princes capacity is 48k, the Stade Velodrome (Marseille) is 67k yet PSG allegedly get 2.5x as much revenue......