No they haven't, they have agreed in principle to take him permanently although no fixed fee has been agreed yet. We will get more for him than the packet of skips and the can of irn bru you got for the lazy bastard having paid £31 million for him. Your manager is thick, it took him 4 years to release the lazy bastard is useless. Most of us only took five minutes to realise that.
Also fail to see the point in that quote you laid on me, where did I say anything about it being down to the Glazers? I was making points on you annual report from '2001'
Did you not realise because they are Manchester United ''owners debt'' doesn't apply to them. However it applies to all other clubs. All together now U N I T E D That spells ****ing debt to me With a nick nack paddy whack Give a rag a loan Ocean finance on the phone.
He was a disappointment but he won a couple of titles and was the top scorer in the PL one season so not a complete failure. I doubt West Ham's Andy Carroll will have similar success at Liverpool but who knows, your next manager might decide to keep him!
Not getting angry at all, gettign more amused at you inept capabililty of dealing legitimate facts laid before you. As for 'My owndoing' you were the one who provided the link to the annual report that makes you look ****ing garbage, the sad thing is 'on paper' you're worth about 1.4billion in reality you worth about minus £435 million meaning your owners have managed to take off 1.8 billion pounds worth of value! You couldn;t script this ****. PS, UIR come on now, get yourself off to bed, you'll only be cranky tomorrow No change there then!)
You said United were suffering from years of over spending which is bollocks. Simple really, bit like you!
The bad news for you lot is Fat Sam isn't stupid enough to take fatty Anderson. Maybe if Taggart lets Sam have a go on Darrens ex wife, then maybe he will. Having been with Darren she likes it rough. He swings with the left He turns with the riiiiight Old Darren Ferguson He beats up his wife.
And I stand by that claim you ****in numbnuts! Quick Fix has even continued knowing your washed up financially this season by signing RVP. It must really ****ing grate on you knowing you can't compete financially with the teams like Chelsea and, who was the other team that can outweigh you in the transfer markets? Oh that's right, it's the noisy neighbours...You need to look a little closer to home with re to the 'simple' bit, you are constantly being proven wrong and the good thing is, it's with your own ****in facts and figures!
You've made a tit of yourself from the comedy 2004 transfer assertions to the above. United's debt is less than the value of the club, the Glazers could repay the debt by selling the club. If they couldn't satisfy the annual repayments the lenders would force a sale, no different to a mortgage (assuming you know what a mortgage is). The reason the ****ers can still spend money on "quick fixes" like RVP is because they know that not only are they getting the best player in the league but if push came to shove they could sell up and get out intact. Lenny Henry can't risk 6million on Dempsey. That should worry the **** out of you.
I have said before, Liverpool fans and the word 'fact' is a joke. You have no idea what they are. Its actually getting embarrassing for two now.
Since Roman took over Chelsea we've won more PL titles than they have so I'd have to argue that we have more than competed. Since Sheikh took over City we've won more PL titles than they have so.... EDIT: you now seem to be resorting to calling me a "homo". Very grown up!
Both him and UIR have both been proved wrong. The only point we made earlier, is that even though with the help of the FFP, they may be able to limit the spending of City and Chelsea, they have other concerns. Could they compete with Liverpool and Arsenal? They have zero debt, have cut expenditure to a sustainable level, and have increased their commercial port-folios? Its both that are going to knock Manchester United over. We'll meet them on their way down.
I know this may be a bit too much for your minute brain to deal with but, FSG didn't want to offer any more than £3million for Dempsey due to age and the fact that he didn't the strategy they have. Yes that's right, they have a strategy unlike the double glazers who like to throw everythininto the air and see where it lands. Now, back to the fact that you can't compete anymore, haven't you been consistently out muscled transfer market over the past year or so? Moura, Modirc, Schneider...The only reason you got RVP was because no one else wanted to offer more than £20 million for him. I guess you won't let the truth get in the way of a good story though eh fella - You won him because you offered the most money. Either way, it backs up what I've been saying all day - Over spending, and quick fix! You can't argue wirth them facts NOB
So next season will be your season? You're turning a corner? Liverpool have turned so many corners they must be bumping into themselves.
