Only a cash rich buyer could take it off their hands. No big club will ever be as highly leveraged as United were back in 2005. The world economy has changed dramatically Paige.
Where is your proof? You don't have any you mong, in the same way you don't have any proof that Man U are going to generate £500 million in revenue in 2014, I do have proof that Liverpools commercial growth is going to increase as its increased by 300% in the last 12 months.
Proof eh? Your posts are all the proof we need Slevin. I would like to see your proof though, so I can laugh at it.
It's called an Annual Report. This is the one from 2001. Other years available if you want to read them after you've worked your way through this one. Happy reading. http://production.investis.com/manutd/findata/respres/anrep2001/anrep2001.pdf Once you've finished reading the report write a summary, there's a good lad.
My apologies if I am replicating posts by other people who have set you straight on yet another load of bollox, I am catching up after a day enjoying the sunshine. Of the 8 players you listed as being signed in 2004 only one was actually signed in 2004. You need to sprint, a jog just won't do the job. EDIT: I see I am just echoing other posts!
It may not be Platini's interpretation, but I'm pretty sure it's a UEFA appointed committee that has the final word on whether deals are ok or not.
Actually you've spouted a load of crap which has been proven to be a load of crap. Your opinion is therefore worth crap. But thanks for contributing!
If the powerful Clubs are not allowed to do what they want, when they want & how they want, they will just organise things themselves. Just as they did in England in 1992, so will they do across Europe. Premier League/UEFA are nothing without income, and without the leading Clubs, there is no income. Anyone could do the admin* *Maybe not G4S
You may have 28 sponsors, but you are also owned by clowns who don't have a pot to piss in. The Glazers idea of investing is taking money out..not putting money in.
I completely agree. And that fact that Real, Barca, Man Utd, Arsenal, AC Milan, Bayern and Dortmund are all behind FFP, and are managing their finances in line with the new rules, tells you all you need to know
And yet we aren't the ones who got outbid by Spurs and Villa for a £6 million player. Must tear you up inside - we get RVP, you can't even get Dempsey
Swarbs How is that you deliberately failed to mention Liverpool who have cut costs and increased commercial growth? They are doing more than Manchester United to be in line with the new rules. They don't have sizeable interest repayments. The only ''debt'' Liverpool have is £40 million Tom Werner and John W Henry borrowed from Fenway Sports Group aka Tom Werner and John W Henry.
UIR the only man that believes the bullshit he writes. As if anyone else was going to believe that Man United are going to make £500 million in revenue?
Oh don't you start as well! I'm one of the good guys on this issue. Of course UEFA will come to a conclusion but a 'dressed' deal that looked totally different to what had gone before would be more than slightly difficult to refuse. If it were then an appeal to CAS would swiftly follow.
What have we learned from this thread and other external sources? 1, Football didn't begin until 1992 2, Anything before above date should be consigned to the histort books along with the birth of Christ, The Ark and 3, 1066 (UIR, you may want to google that cock jockey, learn a bit about the country your team plays in pal) 4, Anyone who dares to suggest they are 'more marketable' than Man Utd must be taken outside and shot immediately 5, Anyone who spends more than Man Utd must surely be embezzling/Laundering money 6, No other team exists - It is all about Man Utd I have constantly proen these guys wrong and yet they continue to argue with the facts put before them. They are a team with a debt incurring £70 million pounds interest annually (http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/08/10/uk-manchester-ipo-idUKBRE8781JP20120810 Quite interesting factual by Reuters. Also worth a read http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/07/07/uk-manchesterunited-glazers-idUKBRE86602B20120707 the fact I find quite interesting is that 'One of the sons' bought the clubs debts
You forgot that we also learned that you have the ability (stupidity) to rewrite history, signing 7 players for United in 2004 before they'd actually joined the club. And also that you're too stupid to know what an annual report is. And that you mixed up Tevez's loan deal at United with the £32million City paid his owner to take him to the Council House. All in all a pretty good follow up to mixing up Liverpool and Everton. Jog on!
May be I should apply for membership to the hypocrisy club given my talent at rewriting history eh NOF! Anyway, how much did the 'loan deal' cost Man Utd? And remember, I want actual proof of anything ridiculous you write! Whonext proving Mancs to wrong and stupid for fun!
