**** sake, he best not troll through the old articles or he's likely to have a stroke Then again, that might not be a bad thing
nah - just re-post the belter from yesterday claiming you were asking "from an anthopological viewpoint only". That was the real hum-dinger; the post that confirmed you as a total ****-stain
I know, I remember him from 606. More stories than Enid Blyton the ****. You know you've made it when they actually start pm'ing you though.