I've just re-read the report and it does indeed propose a cap of 2 non EU players per squad for PL teams 


Per article. Proposed to two non-EU players per squad. That would impact us too! Doesn't bother me as long as it is a level playing field.
The question is in Champions League. If Germany, for example were allowed to buy all our Brazilian and Argentinian maestros would they have an unfair advantage over us?
Quite possibly.
I think what it is proposing may well benefit the national team but it will seriously detract from the quality of the league.
Per article. Proposed to two non-EU players per squad. That would impact us too! Doesn't bother me as long as it is a level playing field.
The question is in Champions League. If Germany, for example were allowed to buy all our Brazilian and Argentinian maestros would they have an unfair advantage over us?
The other question is why should premier league clubs help the English national team? Yeah, we'll spend hundreds of millions on developing players and then you just take them away for a couple of games a year and bring them back tired or injured. Its actually crazy if you think about it.
I don't think there's ever a straight forward acceptance. If players meet the 75% rule, a club will offer sponsorship but all applications then have to go to the FA for them to consider endorsement.
Stoke has the following non-EU players:
Palacios,
Odemwingie,
Shea,
Adam (if Scotland leave Union),
Cameron,
Assaidi (On Loan from us)
They also have out on loan:
Edu,
Ness (another Scottish, potentially non-EU player),
and Agudelo
That's more than the two non-EU players that the FA's plan would allow. Some (most) of them (maybe Adam) would have to leave.
Even a small club like Stoke is currently associated with 9 non-EU players. 7 of them would have to bugger off.
They also have 3 non-EU players in their reserve squad... would they have to go too?
The non-EU player stuff is complete ****e
An EU player is just as not-English as a non-EU player FFS![]()
You can't legally bar a EU player though. If they could- the FA would have quotas on them. They can legally bar non-EU players.
I think the restrictions on not being able to loan out non-home grown talent will hurt Chelsea more than anyone else since they buy everyone and loan them out.
For us... currently, our first squad we have:
Jones, Touré, Suarez, Coutinho, Moses (loan), Coates, Lucas
Of those- I suspect Jones, Moses, and Lucas have been here long enough to get EU citizenship. Suarez and Coutinho would be our "two non-EUs". We could live without Touré. Coates and Lucas. They don't improve us that much- and we probably could find EU equivalents easily.
It impacts us- but isn't a huge impact. Bigger impact is not being able to loan out people like Suso- they'd have to play in that new league instead.
Chelsea would hurt big time unless they could have multiple "B" teams in the league.
Maybe I worded it wrong. You're right that all applications have to go through the FA, what I meant was there aren't any questions to be asked when all the criteria guidelines are matched or bettered. However, not meeting them doesn't mean a transfer won't happen.
The non-EU player stuff is complete ****e
An EU player is just as not-English as a non-EU player FFS![]()
The B team plan has **** all to do with developing English talent and everything to do with the PL getting what they want.
There's nothing wrong with our football pyramid and unlike the leagues in Spain and Germany, it doesn't need 'padding out' with the top sides stiffs.
Non league clubs don't dream of climbing the league ladder to end up playing Stokes reserves ffs. An awful idea and I can't believe Dyke has been stupid enough to be duped by it.