Shock. A) Hull City in poverty playing against Scarborough and Brid town B) Hull Tigers in the Champions league vs Bayern Munich
Nigel Pearson did a great job stabilising the club when it could of drop through the divisions. If he'd of had the backing Bruce he'd probably got us promoted. He probably doesn't get the credit he deserves because of his personality.
I take encouragement from this that you are finally going to expose his lies, deceit and manipulation and uncover the man for what he truly is? I may have to finally throw my £2 in to the cause if you do, although I guess it would be a bit late.
It's no secret that I'm a CTWD person. You just didn't know it. But well done on your cunning detective work. Get ready for CTWD's next phase. It will continue the previous themes.
There's no chance this ballot will be completed and counted up before the FA's deadline. It's a pointless exercise.
It must be a vote of confidence aimed at giving themselves a mandate for not putting the club up for sale. The name change is dead in the water, they're going to appeal to the supporters. Cue Neville Chaimberlain moment.. "I have in my hand a piece of paper" (vote count verified by the Russian Republic of Crimea Independent Ballot Board)
It's all been a pointless exercise. The sensible thing to do would have been to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of the name change; if there was good reason to change the name then publicise the reasons; then have a vote of season cardholders; then if they get broad support apply to the FA to change the name. The Allam's seem to have a different mindset.
No, it must be totally independent. Try Russians they are good at getting the required result. I'm sure they could announce the results in time for the submission to the FA and even before they have to send out ballot papers.
Its obviously going to be a vote of confidence but you wont be able to vote against the name change without voting against the allams. So while the vote doesnt sort the main issue out he will use the results to appeal to the fa??
be ready for that to be followed by a legal challenge in the High Court, followed by a legal challenge to the Supreme Court and then an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
Considering the question is bound to biased in some way, there's hardly any chance the FA will listen to it. If it was a simple yes or no question, they might take notice. But when your question is bound to have some form of blackmail involved there's no chance.
Well then let's just hope CTWD run a well publicised local campaign pulling down his house of lies so the grazing general public passholders see the vote for what it really is and don't fall for his lies, deceit and manipulation.
The Allams will win the pass holders vote by a margin of 58/42, which will allow them to say they have the fans onside, which will also save face, which will allow them to continue as owners of the club even though the FA will reject the name change. The worst case scenario is too horrid for words...
As expected, they're going to try and make this a vote of confidence and will try and avoid the name change question altogether... http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Hull...ust-want/story-20827461-detail/story.html?001 There's some proper bollocks in there, particularly about the vote timing and the FA procedure.
