FA Cup Final

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who do you want to win it?

  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .
Spurlock said:
I'd rather avoid a final than to get absolutely ****ing mullered in it.

Most teams will lose to City but the thing that must hurt is how Watford players heads dropped after goal 1 and they never raised them again...poor.

End of the day they should have put an effort it...should have left nothing on the pitch but it didn't look like that to me.

City have basically had a bye to the FA cup when you look at their run. They're good but they are not the untouchable unbeatable God's everyone thinks they are.

6-0 is shocking for a cup final. Watford got lucky against Wolves and have been living off that for some weird reason. Their league form went to **** aswell.
Click to expand...

Nah that might be true for Spurs but for most of us it’s a once in a generation occasion. To get thumped will sting but still great to have the day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DerekTheMole, FosseFilberto, Libby and 1 other person
West WindsR said:
Nah that might be true for Spurs but for most of us it’s a once in a generation occasion. To get thumped will sting but still great to have the day.
Click to expand...

Have hope...it can happen again..if the middle clubs want to get to domestic finals...I think they have alot more chance nowadays due to other teams not prioritising

Just don't get thumped though
 
Spurlock said:
Have hope...it can happen again..if the middle clubs want to get to domestic finals...I think they have alot more chance nowadays due to other teams not prioritising

Just don't get thumped though
Click to expand...

Playing with ten men while man of the people Deeney took a 90 minute breather didn’t help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Spurlock said:
I'd rather avoid a final than to get absolutely ****ing mullered in it.

Most teams will lose to City but the thing that must hurt is how Watford players heads dropped after goal 1 and they never raised them again...poor.

End of the day they should have put an effort it...should have left nothing on the pitch but it didn't look like that to me.

City have basically had a bye to the FA cup when you look at their run. They're good but they are not the untouchable unbeatable God's everyone thinks they are.

6-0 is shocking for a cup final. Watford got lucky against Wolves and have been living off that for some weird reason. Their league form went to **** aswell.
Click to expand...
How were we lucky against Wolves? We played for 90 minutes they only played for 80. Given your champions league exploits I thought you of all people would get that. Agree with the tailing off in form - can think of a few clubs that experienced similar...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock and Libby
Dan Starkey 2 said:
How were we lucky against Wolves. We played for 90 minutes they only played for 80. Given your champions league exploits I thought you of all people would get that. Agree with the tailing off in form - can think of a few clubs that experienced similar...
Click to expand...

Lucky may not be the right word but even my mate who refuses to see anything bad in any of your performances from the last 20 years thought you were **** for 80 minutes. Wolves should’ve put it to bed but at 2-0 you’re susceptible to a bit of magic and a defensive brain fart.
 
West WindsR said:
Lucky may not be the right word but even my mate who refuses to see anything bad in any of your performances from the last 20 years thought you were **** for 80 minutes. Wolves should’ve put it to bed but at 2-0 you’re susceptible to a bit of magic and a defensive brain fart.
Click to expand...
I don't disagree with any of that. But as you say they should have put it to bed and we got the chance and nailed it.
 
Dan Starkey 2 said:
How were we lucky against Wolves? We played for 90 minutes they only played for 80. Given your champions league exploits I thought you of all people would get that. Agree with the tailing off in form - can think of a few clubs that experienced similar...
Click to expand...

I wasn't saying youre 'lucky' as in you fluked it... but you blasted them in a short burst. That's fair play but you have been celebrating ever since and the rest was seen as a bonus.

Yesterday you played the occasion...maybe because I am a Spurs fan I can see these things as we have been guilty of it in the past too.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted.......
PISKIE said:
Gonna type that into google translate, but guessing you agree with me right ?
Click to expand...
Nope. Seaman's wasn't even in the same league as Monty's double save.
 
FosseFilberto said:
Why would you buy 4 Rio Ferdinands? ... you only needed the one ... but the point still stands (although you still missed it, likely because you are a bit thick) ... United spent plenty in those years and that was not a lot different from what Chelsea and City have done and continue to do (in City's case) ... that spending power has been hugely significant in 'buying' success ... Fergie didn't forge a dynasty on a proverbial shoestring.
Click to expand...

The point doesn't still stand because it was completely different you ****ing dick.

And you suggest it's me that's thick?

<laugh> (an emoji to prove my point)
 
Chief said:
The point doesn't still stand because it was completely different you ****ing dick.

And you suggest it's me that's thick?

<laugh> (an emoji to prove my point)
Click to expand...

Wasn't different at all 2 by 4 ... but I'll spell it out for you as you're coming across as Benny from Crossroads ...

Money has had enormous influence on success in football... it didn't start with Chelsea and City ... both Liverpool and United had tremendous financial clout during their pomp periods and were able to cherry pick the best players because they could bid the most and pay the most in wages ... that undoubtedly extended the glory years ... City are now in that position and I think they are going to be there for some time yet ...

Now go and put the bins out for Miss Diane whilst it is still sinking in ...<ok>
 
And I'll spell it out to you.

Buying one £30million plus player IS NOT the same as buying ten £30 million plus players.

It is that simple.
 
Chief said:
And I'll spell it out to you.

Biting one £30million plus player IS NOT the same as buying ten £30 million plus players.

It is that simple.
Click to expand...

Well you shouldn't have bit him, you Fookin weirdo ...

Like Ferdinand was your only expensive purchase, Benny <doh>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back