I wouldn't worry about it. The chances are they'll skim read it and just add it to the numbers objecting to the name change.
[video=youtube;VEkwNic4Ux0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=VEkwNic4Ux0[/video]
If you wish to impart your gratitude, then email Dr Allam, why not go ahead and email the PL with your heartfelt thanks to Cashconverters for that old TV you pawned off? They would be delighted, I'm sure
So the CWTID group say they are certain the FA will uphold tradition (which I am assuming will be one of the reasons quoted in numerous emails sent to the FA), is this the same FA who allowed sponsorship of the FA cup, the TV channels to dictate what time the FA cup final is played, allowed Coventry to move out of their stadium and play in a different county, allowed grounds to be sponsored and allowed Wimbledon to change their name (technically) and where they are located - all of which are not in some people's eyes having the traditions of the game upheld.
We haven't said we're certain of anything, we're just hopeful that they will do the right thing and we'll be petitioning them to do so.
I fully expect the FA to tell him sorry but no , you have no reasonable case to change the 109 year old name of the club
All these issues were about money. I don't think anybody - besides Allam - seriously believes that Hull Tigers will improve our finances. Most people think changing the name will make us a joke and that will tarnish the FA and Premier League by association.