the problem is Dave, is that Rob talks 95% bollocks. He offers evidence like one supporters post on TWTD yet when I said TWTD was like canary call most times and that did he believe canary call, he changes the subject or goes missing. Also He stated this bollocks about set piece goals, at first I thought yeah ok he is right, but then JWM gave facts to differ that and I held my hands up and said I was wrong, Yet Rob then started spouted a load of old bollocks and how you had to add headed goals against the set piece goals. when you talk to any expert they will tell you that it is set piece goals against open play goals, then to break it down further then you look at how many were headers and such like. that is pure football logic that has stood the test of time until obviously Rob shows his face. Now I know you will back him to the hilt, because that is your right to have an opinion, but is it right to agree with him just because he supports the same team as you?
