Why insisting with Ramsey on a position which is not even his? you got oxo AND gervinho who can play there. Simply makes no sense. Yes Ramsey had ONE good game on the side vs City but that's it.
If not Gervinho then at least Oxo...this is their positions....in my view ramsey should be AFTER gervinho and oxo when it comes to the wing and after Wilshere, Carzola (and Diaby and Rosicky) when it comes to the middle. This is why I am always puzzled when he starts. In wenger we....ehh no.
Ramsey might frustrate sometimes but at least the ball doesnt bounce off his foot and go straight out of play every time
Then again, when was the last time we won a game with Ramsey starting? He's like Denilson... ineffective defensively, ineffective offensively, poor passing (many of his passes go to opposition)... he must do some amazing things in training to keep getting picked. Either that or Wenger's usual stubborn reluctance to admit someone he chased personally isn't actually that good a footballer. Either way, if he doesn't contribute much, it's Wenger's fault for picking him.
Made up with our XI to be honest, it's spot on and only Mirallas in injured from that Xi. We still haven't lost with Gibson on the pitch either. 2-0 blues.
Or putting it a different way: Dear Mr SJW, I would be most grateful if as always you would kindly provide me with a link for the game this evening. As always I will be eternally grateful of your amazing prowess at finding said link. Kind regards, Mr Magic Man Your obedient servant.
That **** is illegal, I am told. So I will post the link in a subtle way. [NSFW] please log in to view this image [/NSFW]
