If you can't work it out then you must be extraordinarily stupid.
Nothing to work out fella, they're both a joke. If you can't work that out, you're extroadinarily stupid

If you can't work it out then you must be extraordinarily stupid.

If you can't work it out then you must be extraordinarily stupid.

Nothing to work out fella, they're both a joke. If you can't work that out, you're extroadinarily stupid![]()

I bet you weren't such a **** when you were younger. It's sad when old age turns people into bitter tools.

So you ask a question and then can't work out the answer but you say there's nothing to work out. It's obvious that you would have trouble holding down a proper job.Nothing to work out fella, they're both a joke. If you can't work that out, you're extroadinarily stupid![]()
So you ask a question and then can't work out the answer but you say there's nothing to work out. It's obvious that you would have trouble holding down a proper job.

Is this you Pete????

Which one is the proper one and which is the impersonator? I think that's the real question. Often one is simply casting a reflection on the other, like a mirror. After all, why have the impersonator? BTW having such a sanctimonuous name for a political party is asking for ridicule. It stinks of elitism.
I suppose it wasn't very sensible!....
Hilarious. What a ****wit!It's called a rhetorical question, the point being it's designed to make you reflect on the point being made. I dare say that's a touch high brow for you Pete
I just googled the Sensible Party, you'll have your work cut out being taken seriously, the first page is full of Monty Python sketchesIs this you Pete????
You must log in or register to see media
A bit stupid not doing your research fella. Lesson learned... before naming your Party make sure it hasn't been ridiculed on a Monty Python sketch![]()
![]()
![]()
I suppose you are one of those simple people who needs to google rather than knows what sketches Monty Python does. You should think about trying to be a well rounded individual rather than be one of these people who knows nothing and uses google. Maybe that's why children have very little knowledge nowadays. We need teachers of quality before we will get children of quality.It's called a rhetorical question, the point being it's designed to make you reflect on the point being made. I dare say that's a touch high brow for you Pete
I just googled the Sensible Party, you'll have your work cut out being taken seriously, the first page is full of Monty Python sketchesIs this you Pete????
You must log in or register to see media
A bit stupid not doing your research fella. Lesson learned... before naming your Party make sure it hasn't been ridiculed on a Monty Python sketch![]()
![]()
![]()
I suppose you are one of those simple people who needs to google rather than knows what sketches Monty Python does. You should think about trying to be a well rounded individual rather than be one of these people who knows nothing and uses google. Maybe that's why children have very little knowledge nowadays. We need teachers of quality before we will get children of quality.
TheTories are can't get their voting papers out before the middle of next month and won't announce the result until September 9. I would not call that close and it is is not very sensible when we need action now. Sort them out PeteThe Conservative Party gets close to a conclusion with their leadership contest
The Labour Party is stuck with a conflict between their MPs and party members
The morons continue to act like children
TheTories are can't getter voting papers out before the middle of next month and won'announce the result until September 9. I would not call that close and it is is not very sensible when the we need action now. Sort them out Pete
TheTories are can't get their voting papers out before the middle of next month and won't announce the result until September 9. I would not call that close and it is is not very sensible when we need action now. Sort them out Pete
If only we'd voted a sensible party in
