Off Topic EU deabte. Which way are you voting ?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How will you vote in the EU referendum ?


  • Total voters
    74
Status
Not open for further replies.
I surmised it. Narrow minded little Englanders aren't actually that hard to spot mate. You, for instance, probably reacted with horror at the sight of a Polski Sklep opening up next door to Betfred.
You really should stop "surmising" - it shows a lack of knowledge and intelligence. I've never bet in my life and my wife is Polish. I'd give up on attempting to think. You are not cut out for it.
 
It's an interpretation. Not one I recognise unless you assume the government are deciding to leave skilled jobs unfilled based on immigration from the EU. As our immigration from non EU countries is higher than EU then I'm not sure it's born out either.
Why should the government or business want skilled jobs unfilled?
 
Why should the government or business want skilled jobs unfilled?
My point exactly. However it appears in their need to show they are tackling immigration they have put barriers in place that have resulted in exactly this. Wrongly in my opinion.
 
Unless you are negotiating the terms then you have no control of what will happen. Whatever happens will be a negotiated compromise and as I suggested previously could easily be a phased withdrawal over many years.
There are plenty of principled determined people in British politics - step forward David Davis!
We were never going to appoint a weak unprincipled person who is scared of their own shadow and would be happy with a "negotiated compromise".
We will set out what we want, what the red lines are, and if the EU don't respect our view then WTO tariffs will be the way to go and we will get a lot of money in from the EU companies when they export to us - much more than what our exporters will have to pay. The tariffs we receive will allow us to reduce taxes.
 
Do you think it displays a reasonable level of intelligence if, when asked a question, he doesn't answer it yet claims to have answered it over and over again. Wouldn't it make sense to just copy the answer? Unless an answer didn't exist!

Mate, you spout so much ignorant bollocks that intelligent replies are totally wasted on you.

You're a typical narrow minded, little England bigot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Mate, you spout so much ignorant bollocks that intelligent replies are totally wasted on you.

You're a typical narrow minded, little England bigot.
Why do you just shout out insults and never answer the questions asked? Because you dont have the answers? Because you are childish? Both? Yes, it's both!
 
I think you might find he might be more able to understand this if you were to point out that it isn't necessarily a deliberate policy objective, but simply an unfortunate policy consequence.

But I wouldn't bank on it ...
He doesn't do understanding. He does shouting insults.
 
Why do you just shout out insults and never answer the questions asked? Because you dont have the answers? Because you are childish? Both? Yes, it's both!

I have answered your stupid 'questions', if that's what you call them. You're either too thick or too bigoted to understand or accept the answers!..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
I wouldn't disagree with that at all. I'm not sure why we lack trained nurses. I suspect a part of it is down to the change from SRN/SEN to degree level entry.

Underfunding is clearly a factor. The reasons for that underfunding is a matter of debate.

A consequence of that shortfall is the need to recruit from outside the Country.
My wife worked as a physiologist in Poland with a degree in the subject but when she came to London she would have needed to do a four year degree in the UK before she could work as a physiologist here so she didn't do it.
 
I have answered your stupid 'questions', if that's what you call them. You're either too thick or too bigoted to understand or accept the answers!..
I was talking about not answering the question asked by Hull City AFC (DMD). Don't you remember him accusing you of not answering his question? I haven't accused you of not answering my questions. You seem to need to have everything explained to you at a very simple level.
 
You really are a broken record. What's really sad is your attempts to put down others just serve as a reminder that you are so busy looking for a line of attack that the actual discussion passes you by.
We all understood your point Peter, problem is your point wasn't the purpose of the original post and at no time did the original post imply that people coming to the UK applied to their own country for a visa
what does this mean?:
I’mBetterThanYouIWentTo.. said: “how many countries with a predominantly white population require a visa for the purpose of their visit before their citizens can even board a flight or ferry bound for the UK?” [HASHTAG]#9533[/HASHTAG]
that is actually talking about countries requiring a visa before their citizens travel to the UK.
 
I was talking about not answering the question asked by Hull City AFC (DMD). Don't you remember him accusing you of not answering his question? I haven't accused you of not answering my questions. You seem to need to have everything explained to you at a very simple level.

His stupid, ignorant question was answered. He, being the know it all he thinks he is, chose not to accept the answer.

His whole premise about EU immigration policy being either intentionally or unintentionally racist, is utter inane bollocks.

Is that clear enough?....
 
His stupid, ignorant question was answered. He, being the know it all he thinks he is, chose not to accept the answer.

His whole premise about EU immigration policy being either intentionally or unintentionally racist, is utter inane bollocks.

Is that clear enough?....
It's clear that you disagree with him.
It's also clear you have not given any valid reasons to support your case - but then again I didnt think you were capable of that level of analysis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.