Good choice of phrase! but how is it smart? Totally agree with Jagielka's appraisal.....then swap him for that twat Terry!. The MF was already patchy as highlighted by PNP, so how is playing someone 'who can do a job' there instead of Carrick who position it is , smart? MC should and would have gone in place of Barry, I wasn't aware of the Hodg snub though.
What Richards has to do to get ahead of Johnson is anyone's guess.![]()
If "Carrick" didn't want a place in the squad (not that I'm implying the decision was made for him by a manager who has seen a lot of player retire from internationals once they turn 30...), the other options to understudy Parker for the tournament are what's left of Owen Hargreaves and Jake Livermore. Hargreaves would've been a massive gamble for so many reasons (mainly his injury record and lack of match fitness) whilst Livermore would've been a gamble based on lack of international experience.
If those are the options, Jagielka is a smart decision as an understudy - albeit one who is more likely to play at right back. Which is where Micah Richards should be playing. This is going to go around in circles, isn't it?

