If those women get behind the wheel of a car wearing that clobber then we're all ****ed. Virgin or not.
Its not as ok as you believe/think. The people of the book have a set definition too. Today you would struggle to find people of the book For example I go back to the gay and women priests issue, that was never in the book
It doesnt need to, the people of the book thing still stands today, Its finding the people of the book that is a task The so called jews and christians today are simply not of the books
It's a vague and virtually meaningless question. What's my view on existence? What aspect of it would you like my views on? If it was Jesus then it wouldn't be a new prophet, would it? I understood the Elijah was a messenger and not a prophet. I've not seen any claims to the contrary from either him or his followers, only from other Muslims. If the fella isn't Jesus, then yes. The Nation of Islam don't seem to be claiming that though, as far as I can see. What gat (gay?) and woman priest issue? You're claiming that Jews and Christians don't believe in the same god that Muslims do, but apparently now they do, presumably for the purpose of making this all fit. Either they do believe in the same god, which would remove any contradiction here but make your other claims incorrect, or they don't. Which is it? Because we dealt with it 10 pages ago, so it's unnecessary. Go back and read it again if you've forgotten. Evidence? Really? I disagree. When did I suggest that you shouldn't address the Quran on matters of sharia, anyway? I merely pointed out that your first point of reference for anything is the Quran. You're operating from the assumption that one of them is probably right. I've seen nothing in any religion that suggests that there's a god, so your suggestion seems to imply that I should go into a massive investigation of each one, just in case. I can see enough holes in Islam to suggest to me that it's not correct. You don't see those holes. You see the same holes in other faiths, but their adherents don't. As usual, you've failed to read what I've written. I ask you to clarify what you mean and then state why it's possible that Christianity could conflict with Tawheed, so it's obvious that I do know what it means. I was wondering why you thought Tawheed was relevant to Christians and Jews marrying Muslims, as they're also monotheists. That's just rubbish. I asked you why the Egyptian politician was wrong on at least three levels and you still haven't said what they were, suggesting that not knowing what they are makes someone wrong. That's just avoidance. Saying 'Google it' isn't an answer either, despite your claims to the contrary. Then you clearly don't know what it means, either. So are you saying that there's not anyone that actually does this, then? Has nobody attempted it in the last 50 years, say? Wikipedia uses sources to reference it's data. Some of those sources are reliable and some aren't. I don't think that this one is. No hypocrisy required, I'm afraid. See above. That's definitely your own take on it. I'm sure that you'd have no trouble finding faithful and dedicated Jews, for a start. And the Muslims are? You're generalising massively.
You obviously have no idea of what we have been discussing do you That has been my whole point from beginning to now. The whole debate has been that there is NO country implementing Shariah and muslims having the wrong understanding of Islam.
To PNP With regards to elijah mohammed In his own words I am elijah of the bible and Muhammad of the quran Both prophets also look up the documents/letters written on his behalf. Clearly signed as 'Prophet Elijah Mohammed' even WD Fard used to use the word 'prophet' before his name in letters and public notices Some even went as far as suggesting Fard was an incarnation of God
