Yeah it should tell him, will be listed for every year, I can track back to when I first had employment at the age of 16.
It is, and I've checked it. As I say, it's only slightly less than the other years,
Yeah it should tell him, will be listed for every year, I can track back to when I first had employment at the age of 16.
Yeah, that was the question - shall I sign on knowing I can't get benefits, or will they kick me off if I refuse work?
Depends how long before you get your pension to make that decision. If you are talking 6 months I wouldn't bother, if you are talking 2 years then I would, but yes, they will make you look for work.
It depends on how much those missing years you value and if you are two years away, it would fill the gap, if the gap is two years.
so was i and having just checked my record i have full conts for those years so unless it was after 2014 i;m at a lossShe did over the phone. She actually said those in the CS were in the same boat as many of those, including herself, were in defined benefit schemes as well.
god knows now but in my day if a 63 year old came in and said i'm only signing for the credits everyone just went thru the motionsDepends how long before you get your pension to make that decision. If you are talking 6 months I wouldn't bother, if you are talking 2 years then I would, but yes, they will make you look for work.
It depends on how much those missing years you value and if you are two years away, it would fill the gap, if the gap is two years.
god knows now but in my day if a 63 year old came in and said i'm only signing for the credits everyone just went thru the motions
always was because if nowt else the Advisors had targets so they cherry picked the cases to work on but even worse was when they used outsourcing as those ****s just didn't even bother seeing loads of peeps as they didn't view them as easy to get into work despite the contract their bosses signed up for stated lots would need help to get "job ready".Probably still the same for a 63 year old lol, the government might want us to work until we drop but the faces delivering it are probably more fook this.


The original advert is one of my current favourites, the shop owner is brilliant
Reeves is now expected to slash people’s benefits.
Pensioners = Less Money
Working man and woman = Higher taxes, less money.
People on benefits = Less money.
Union workers = Massive pay rises without reform. (22bn black hole?)
NHS for us all = No money without reform.
Working class party folks. No austerity here
Labour supporters are still on mute. They know they’ve been hoodwinked and this government is every bit as bad as the Tories at their worst.
You must log in or register to see imagesYou must log in or register to see imagesYou must log in or register to see imagesYou must log in or register to see images
I believe everything if it is on the internet.I know you don’t actually believe that but the sad thing is the easily groomed will.
Polling expert Prof Sir John Curtice has spoken to Radio 4's Today programme - claiming Keir Starmer has "never been a popular leader", and has "two weaknesses".
"He's never been very successful at doing what George Bush called the vision thing," he says.
"What is the Labour Party for, what his government trying to achieve, what kid of Britain does he want... that lack of narrative is being exposed."
Curtice also says Starmer has "not always had a strong political antenna, and that's been exposed in the last week or two".
He says it's fair too early to rule out a second Labour term after the next general election. But he says "what we've seen in the last few weeks is perhaps not surprising".