Lot of woke nonsense on here when a slap and a warning it’ll be worse if they answer back is all that’s required for society to function. We ruled half the world when it was like this before political correctness went mad.
Like I said it sounds harsh but they objectively are though. Can't vote, can't pay tax, can't have sex, can't drink alcohol and so on.
I think you need a balance of the two personally, or at least that's what I try to do.
I always try and explain the logic behind my decisions he doesn't like but if he wants to act silly bugger I'll happily revert to the authority and there's always a time and place for that.
People who use no authority at all often end up with relationships like friends rather than parent-child imo and I think that becomes very unhealthy in mid to late adolescence.
Lot of woke nonsense on here when a slap and a warning it’ll be worse if they answer back is all that’s required for society to function. We ruled half the world when it was like this before political correctness went mad.
^^^^ Doesn't have any kids
I appreciate this might seem mental but maybe they could actually go outside? Radical I know.
I've mixed views on this but one big plus side is it'll make me look less of a **** parent as I had no intention of letting my nipper use it anyway.
The funniest thing about this imo is that loads of kids apparently use Youtube to study and now you are banning them from the site
There's a balancing act and it's not straightforward - you don't want your kid to miss out by being the only one in the class / group without access to stuff etc ... but then there is the parental responsibility to protect from the many negative, and sometimes brutal, aspects ...
We only let ours have mobile phones when they went to secondary schools and also monitored what they were being used for - way more difficult with the better tech phones they subsequently got, admittedly.
Well perhaps a bit harsh but they kind of are second class citizens until they reach a point where they can contribute to society?
I went too far with the slapping^^^^ Doesn't have any kids
The funniest thing about this imo is that loads of kids apparently use Youtube to study and now you are banning them from the site
I think it was more a case of finding him a shoe box on the porch with a note attached.Didn't he adopt sucky?
can't happen as
a) The US Govt would go mental
b) VPN's exist
I don't know what the answer is and I moderate this site, and just can't think how they would manage a ban. Older kids are tech savvy and will always find a way around it - it's like knowing all the cheat codes on games, they pride themselves on it.This is what I mean. It’s a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
There has got to be better ways to manage online content for kids rather than just banning it all
There's a balancing act and it's not straightforward - you don't want your kid to miss out by being the only one in the class / group without access to stuff etc ... but then there is the parental responsibility to protect from the many negative, and sometimes brutal, aspects ...
We only let ours have mobile phones when they went to secondary schools and also monitored what they were being used for - way more difficult with the better tech phones they subsequently got, admittedly.
I don't know what the answer is and I moderate this site, and just can't think how they would manage a ban. Older kids are tech savvy and will always find a way around it - it's like knowing all the cheat codes on games, they pride themselves on it.
I don't agree with the time restraints, that has to be down to parents, not government, like telling the kids what time to go to bed, that's your job as a parent to set the ground rules - if they don't they don't, it's not for nanny state to intefere in that. You can give the guidance but that's all it should be.