Election 2024

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How are Labour doing after their first 12 months


  • Total voters
    23
Like I said it sounds harsh but they objectively are though. Can't vote, can't pay tax, can't have sex, can't drink alcohol and so on.

I think you need a balance of the two personally, or at least that's what I try to do.

I always try and explain the logic behind my decisions he doesn't like but if he wants to act silly bugger I'll happily revert to the authority and there's always a time and place for that.

People who use no authority at all often end up with relationships like friends rather than parent-child imo and I think that becomes very unhealthy in mid to late adolescence.

Yeah, I agree with that.

I think the best parent/child relationships come from having good communication and fostering an environment where your kid respects the fact that you are the parent, and sometimes you do know best.
 
I appreciate this might seem mental but maybe they could actually go outside? Radical I know.

I've mixed views on this but one big plus side is it'll make me look less of a **** parent as I had no intention of letting my nipper use it anyway.

There's a balancing act and it's not straightforward - you don't want your kid to miss out by being the only one in the class / group without access to stuff etc ... but then there is the parental responsibility to protect from the many negative, and sometimes brutal, aspects ...

We only let ours have mobile phones when they went to secondary schools and also monitored what they were being used for - way more difficult with the better tech phones they subsequently got, admittedly.
 
There's a balancing act and it's not straightforward - you don't want your kid to miss out by being the only one in the class / group without access to stuff etc ... but then there is the parental responsibility to protect from the many negative, and sometimes brutal, aspects ...

We only let ours have mobile phones when they went to secondary schools and also monitored what they were being used for - way more difficult with the better tech phones they subsequently got, admittedly.

My original plan was smart phone at 15 but depending what comes of this might wait til 16.
 
The funniest thing about this imo is that loads of kids apparently use Youtube to study and now you are banning them from the site

This is what I mean. It’s a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

There has got to be better ways to manage online content for kids rather than just banning it all
 
This is what I mean. It’s a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

There has got to be better ways to manage online content for kids rather than just banning it all
I don't know what the answer is and I moderate this site, and just can't think how they would manage a ban. Older kids are tech savvy and will always find a way around it - it's like knowing all the cheat codes on games, they pride themselves on it.

I don't agree with the time restraints, that has to be down to parents, not government, like telling the kids what time to go to bed, that's your job as a parent to set the ground rules - if they don't they don't, it's not for nanny state to intefere in that. You can give the guidance but that's all it should be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
There's a balancing act and it's not straightforward - you don't want your kid to miss out by being the only one in the class / group without access to stuff etc ... but then there is the parental responsibility to protect from the many negative, and sometimes brutal, aspects ...

We only let ours have mobile phones when they went to secondary schools and also monitored what they were being used for - way more difficult with the better tech phones they subsequently got, admittedly.

I think a lot of it depends on the kid as well.

My daughter has a smart phone. She’s had it since she started secondary school.

We chat together as a family about what she uses it for, what apps and content she’s viewing etc. I don’t physically check her phone, but I think/hope we have an understanding based on trust that she uses it appropriately

That said, I’ve no doubt there have been times she’s seen stuff that Id rather she didn’t. Then again, is that part of growing up and working out the world around you ?

Our generation used to find porno mags in the bushes. Set up a camp and go there and smoke ***s lol

And having said all of that, I think there are kids who probably shouldn’t have access to any of it, (smart phones not porno mags) because they either don’t respect the boundaries, aren’t mature enough to deal with what they are viewing, don’t have the ability to self regulate or would be psychologically traumatised by what they are consuming/ or susceptible to online bullying etc.

It’s not an easy landscape to navigate and ultimately i think it should come down to the parents to decide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
I don't know what the answer is and I moderate this site, and just can't think how they would manage a ban. Older kids are tech savvy and will always find a way around it - it's like knowing all the cheat codes on games, they pride themselves on it.

I don't agree with the time restraints, that has to be down to parents, not government, like telling the kids what time to go to bed, that's your job as a parent to set the ground rules - if they don't they don't, it's not for nanny state to intefere in that. You can give the guidance but that's all it should be.

agree with that

And if history tells us anything about banning stuff, is that it just gets pushed underground and onto less regulated and more shady areas
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb