Quite frankly couldn't give a **** what you or anyone else thinks of Islam. I live it and I enjoy the fruits of it.
What's islams stance on recreational mind changing drugs Danish?
Quite frankly couldn't give a **** what you or anyone else thinks of Islam. I live it and I enjoy the fruits of it.
If the fundamentals of that belief system don't stand up to the standards they apply to other beliefs that they themselves dismiss.
You could aim that at the vast majority of religious believers of every faith.If the fundamentals of that belief system don't stand up to the standards they apply to other beliefs that they themselves dismiss.
Big sweeping statement that doesn't apply to everyone.
The logic of dismissing one faith system over another applies to someone that chooses a single group as much as it applies to someone that chooses none, particularly with Abrahimic faiths.
Exactly. Faith is faith. You either believe or you don't. If you believe - have faith, you don't question. You accept it for what it is. If you have to question it, you also have to question your faith.
For that to be right, the same logic and criteria would have to apply to a belief in reptilian shape shifters and santa.
If that's your thing then fine, but there is of course a basis to most if not all organised religions so it is a little different to your example.
For that to be right, the same logic and criteria would have to apply to a belief in reptilian shape shifters and santa.
There is no set criteria, that's the whole point. Faith is faith, it's what person or group of people believe. No matter how illogical it may sound to someone who doesn't share that faith.
Because of the gaping holes in ALL religions man has prostituted the word of God for his own ends. Faith is your own leap in the dark if you like. But indoctrination is another, what a ****ed up ideal religion is!There is a basis for some of the stories, but the interpretation and claims are certainly questionable in both examples.
To have faith in one over another implies that the 'others' are either unexamined and therefore could be better, or dismissed in the same way as atheists do.
So you wouldn't ridicule someone that believes that reptilian shape shifters run the world?
I think that's spurious. There is zero evidence to support that theory. However, Icke and his loopy followers are welcome to believe what they wish.
As I have already said, faith is faith, no matter how illogical it may be to you or anybody else. That includes Icke, if he truly believes that nonsense.
At least most religions are based on ancient texts. Open to misinterpretation, granted. But there is, at least, some solid base from that time to support their beliefs.
I think you're missing the point of what faith means to those who follow religion.That's not being disputed. What I'm asking (with caveats) is on what grounds does a believer in one religion dismiss the beliefs of all the others?
In what way is that dismissal different to an atheist dismissing theirs?
That's not being disputed. What I'm asking (with caveats) is on what grounds does a believer in one religion dismiss the beliefs of all the others?
In what way is that dismissal different to an atheist dismissing theirs?
I'm not so sure that they do necessarily dismiss them. Most tolerant believers will accept that you are free to believe what you wish, they just beg to differ, and follow a different path.
The existence of Jesus as a messiah, for instance, is accepted by Muslims. They do not accept his divinity, however.
So, far from all of other faith's beliefs are dismissed by one another.
What's islams stance on recreational mind changing drugs Danish?